On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 08:17:49PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> But it is now mostly obsolete. Lots of things had to change while writing
> a prototype and following public discussions. At the moment my focus is on
> tidying up the base, but I will send another RFC afterwards.
Thanks! Pl
On 13/07/17 18:44, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:29:42AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> On 12/07/17 23:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I think using hardware support for nesting is the right final
>>> solution. It will take some time though. Given this, w
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:29:42AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On 12/07/17 23:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> [...]
> > I think using hardware support for nesting is the right final
> > solution. It will take some time though. Given this, what should
> > we do meanwhile?
> >
> > Assuming
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/13/2017 5:20 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Sricharan R
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Vivek,
>>>
>>> On 7/13/2017 10:43 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wro
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Vivek Gautam
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Sricharan R
> wrote:
>> Hi Vivek,
>>
>> On 7/13/2017 10:43 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> @@ -1231,12
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> On 7/13/2017 10:43 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>>
>> On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
@@ -1231,12 +1237,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain
*doma
Hi,
On 7/13/2017 5:20 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Vivek,
>>
>> On 7/13/2017 10:43 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> @@ -1231,12 +1237,18 @@ s
Hi Rob,
On 2017-07-13 14:10, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
On 2017-07-13 13:50, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Sricharan R
wrote:
On 7/13/2017 10:43 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/06,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 2017-07-13 13:50, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Sricharan R
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/13/2017 10:43 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> On 07/06,
Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
---
.../devicetree/bindings/iommu/qcom,iommu.txt | 121 +
1 file changed, 121 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/qcom,iommu.txt
diff --git a/Document
From: Stanimir Varbanov
This basically gets the secure page table size, allocates memory for
secure pagetables and passes the physical address to the trusted zone.
Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c | 64 +++
An iommu driver for Qualcomm "B" family devices which do implement the
ARM SMMU spec, but not in a way that arm-smmu can support.
(I initially added support to arm-smmu, but it was decided that approach
was too intrusive and it would be cleaner to have a separate driver.)
I should note that all t
I want to re-use some of these for qcom_iommu, which has (roughly) the
same context-bank registers.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-regs.h | 227 ++
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 203 +
2 files chan
An iommu driver for Qualcomm "B" family devices which do implement the
ARM SMMU spec, but not in a way that is compatible with how the arm-smmu
driver is designed. It seems SMMU_SCR1.GASRAE=1 so the global register
space is not accessible. This means it needs to get configuration from
devicetree
Hi All,
On 2017-07-13 13:50, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
On 7/13/2017 10:43 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
@@ -1231,12 +1237,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 13/07/17 07:48, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 07/13, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> @@ -1231,12 +1237,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_map(struct iom
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> On 7/13/2017 10:43 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>>
>> On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
@@ -1231,12 +1237,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain
*domai
On 13/07/17 07:48, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/13, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>>
>> On 07/13/2017 04:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
@@ -1231,12 +1237,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain
*domain, unsigned long iova,
static size_
On 12/07/17 23:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
[...]
> I think using hardware support for nesting is the right final
> solution. It will take some time though. Given this, what should
> we do meanwhile?
>
> Assuming that's the final destination, a simple quirk like this
> seems to be preferable to v
On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:02:42 PM CEST Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 12/07/17 18:20, Federico Vaga wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:15:34 PM CEST Federico Vaga wrote:
> >> Thank you Robin
> >>
> >> (inline comments)
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 1:10:51 PM CEST Robin Murphy wrote:
20 matches
Mail list logo
