On 2017/2/28 3:54, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> The ARM architecture has a "Top Byte Ignore" (TBI) option that makes the
> MMU mask out bits [63:56] of an address, allowing a userspace application
> to store data in its pointers.
>
> The ATS doesn't have an architected mechanism to enable TBI,
On 22/05/17 10:08 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 19/05/17 07:02 PM, arindam.n...@amd.com wrote:
>> From: Arindam Nath
>>
>> Change History
>> --
>>
>> v2: changes suggested by Joerg
>> - add flush flag to improve efficiency of flush operation
>>
>> v1:
>> - The idea behind flush queues
On 19/05/17 07:02 PM, arindam.n...@amd.com wrote:
> From: Arindam Nath
>
> Change History
> --
>
> v2: changes suggested by Joerg
> - add flush flag to improve efficiency of flush operation
>
> v1:
> - The idea behind flush queues is to defer the IOTLB flushing
> for domains for w
>-Original Message-
>From: Jan Vesely [mailto:jv...@scarletmail.rutgers.edu] On Behalf Of Jan
>Vesely
>Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 7:06 PM
>To: Nath, Arindam; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
>Cc: Bridgman, John; Joerg Roedel; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>dr...@endlessm.com; Craig Stein;
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:50:32PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The "worker" function would be doing the loop through the setup data,
> but since the setup data is mapped inside the loop I can't do the __init
> calling the non-init function and still hope to consolidate the code.
> Maybe I'm missin
