Section mismatch in reference from the variable fsl_of_pamu_driver to the
function .init.text:fsl_pamu_probe()
The variable fsl_of_pamu_driver references
the function __init fsl_pamu_probe()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name t
2015-01-20 23:04+0200, Nadav Amit:
> Radim Kr?má? wrote:
> > 2015-01-14 01:27+, Wu, Feng:
> >>> the new
> hardware even doesn't consider the TPR for lowest priority interrupts
> >>> delivery.
> >>>
> >>> A bold move ... what hardware was the first to do so?
> >>
> >> I think it was star
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 16:27:24 j...@8bytes.org wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:07:03PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > As you wish. I just thought you would prefer merging the series with at
> > least one user.
>
> Yes, and with your patch there would be two users: ARM-SMMU and the V
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:07:03PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> As you wish. I just thought you would prefer merging the series with at least
> one user.
Yes, and with your patch there would be two users: ARM-SMMU and the VMSA
IPMMU. So ideally I would apply/pull Will's patches on v3.19-rc5 w
Hi Joerg,
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 16:05:29 j...@8bytes.org wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:58:12PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > All my other ipmmu patches have been queued by Joerg in his next branch,
> > on which this patch is based. If you base your series on the same branch
> > y
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:58:12PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> All my other ipmmu patches have been queued by Joerg in his next branch, on
> which this patch is based. If you base your series on the same branch you can
> just queue this patch on top of it. Do you plan to submit the result to
Hi Will,
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 14:48:35 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:56:03PM +, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 19 January 2015 16:06:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:01:56PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 14 November 2014 19
Hi Will,
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 14:44:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:30:04PM +, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Replace the custom page table allocation implementation with the
> > standard allocator.
> >
> > The driver loses the ability to map 64kB chunkgs using the PTE
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:56:03PM +, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Will,
Hi Laurent,
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Monday 19 January 2015 16:06:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> > (resurrecting an old thread)
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:01:56PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 14
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:30:04PM +, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Replace the custom page table allocation implementation with the
> standard allocator.
>
> The driver loses the ability to map 64kB chunkgs using the PTE
> contiguous hint, hence the removal of the SZ_64K page size from the
> IOMM
Hello Alex,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 11:48 +0100, Antonios Motakis wrote:
> > This patch series aims to implement VFIO support for platform devices that
> > reside behind an IOMMU. Examples of such devices are devices behind an ARM
> > SMMU
11 matches
Mail list logo
