There is a concept in storage devices that fits: Write Once Read Many
(WORM) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write_once_read_many
final class Value {
public worm $name;
public function __construct(string $name) {
$this->name = $name;
}
}
I'm not aware of any programming language
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Dominic Grostate <
codekest...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I've made an amendment to the RFC to clarify on the Nested Types, which is
> indeed supposed to be part of the feature. Rasmus may want to reword it if
> it isn't very clear.
>
> Regarding union and intersec
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 1:00 PM, Lin Yo-An wrote:
> > I think this is not to make PHP like Java, and it totally makes sense -
> > Nullable should be a type of a type instead of a state. In Haskell it's
> > named Maybe or Option, and It's better than Nul
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 4/22/2016 11:42 AM, Quim Calpe wrote:
> > IMHO, the point of Optional types is the intention, if you get an
> > Option from a method, you have to deal with a None branch. Of course
> > you can just unwra
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Quim Calpe wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Fleshgrinder
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/22/2016 11:42 AM, Quim Calpe wrote:
> >> >
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 10/05/16 21:26, Levi Morrison wrote:
> > It can affect the results.
> >
> > function foo(?Foo $param) {}
> >
> > If any code out there is calling foo with null then that code will now
> > break if you remove the question mark.
>
> Car
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Davey Shafik wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Larry Garfield
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > |> seems like a common symbol to use, but it admittedly does look a
> > >
> > > So, usage in
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 08:13 AM, Dominic Grostate wrote:
>
>> I think this may have been discussed before, but I was largely dismissed
>> because no one though it would be possible to implement.
>>
>> However assuming it is possible, what is the gene
