would love to help put together whatever is required
for a new RFC, and do anything to help others who don't see the use for the
short notation.
Justin Carmony
On May 31, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Brian Moon wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortsyntaxforarrays
>
> Since this was bro
I agree with this. So the idea would be adding short hand object notation for
PHP, inspired by JSON, but we also allow for associative arrays. So:
$object = { 'var1': 'one', 'var2': 'two' }; // for an object
$assoc_array = [ 'var1': 'one', 'var2': 'two' ]; // for an array
// even mix and match
s of the PHP
community as a whole.
I know I'm newer to the list, and don't want to step on any toes, but I think
the RFC process could really benefit from getting this type of feedback.
Justin Carmony
On Jun 1, 2011, at 8:37 AM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 7:30
To address the soapbox:
Its not just to reduce the five characters at the beginning, but when you have
more complex structures as well. There was already a great example shown
(http://paste.roguecoders.com/p/0747f2363c228a09e0ddd6f8ec52f2e8.html) of that.
Also, if object support is added (which
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 2, 2011, at 4:19 AM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to introduce an E_NOTICE when an array is silently
> converted to a string.
> This isn't very useful as it constantly produces the following string:
> "Array" and in most of the case, this is a sign
o spam everyone with a wall of text about them.
Justin Carmony
On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Rafael Dohms wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:16 AM, David Coallier wrote:
>> See response inline.
>> ...
>> See Pierre, that's where I believe we are doing things wrong. We