Dear Niels,
First of all, thanks for all your hard work already on the DOM and
SimpleXML extensions. I have been following your work in PHP-SRC, great!
I am the author of this XSL 2.0 Transpiler in PHP package
(https://github.com/genkgo/xsl). It is indeed possible to use
workarounds for closu
Hi Niels,
On 16-10-2023 23:19, Niels Dossche wrote:
Sorry for the resend... I accidentally replied to you only without including
the list the first time.
On 15/10/2023 21:37, Frederik Bosch wrote:
Dear Niels,
First of all, thanks for all your hard work already on the DOM and SimpleXML
On 11-01-2024 19:38, Niels Dossche wrote:
On 21/12/2023 17:52, Niels Dossche wrote:
Hi internals
I'm opening the vote for my RFC "Improve callbacks in ext/dom and ext/xsl".
Link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/improve_callbacks_dom_and_xsl
The voting will run for three weeks, i.e. until 2024-01-11 1
On 18-02-2024 11:47, Derick Rethans wrote:
On 18 February 2024 10:23:59 GMT, Matthew Sewell wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Gmail too but with a custom domain. I did get those three
messages but significantly delayed from when they were on externals.
That sounds about right. The queue was backed up du
On 23-02-2024 16:58, Larry Garfield wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, at 8:33 AM, Stephen Reay wrote:
On 23 Feb 2024, at 06:56, Larry Garfield wrote:
Hi Larry,
It's good to see this idea still progressing.
I have to agree with the other comment(s) that the implicit
`$field`/`$value` variables s
he set function is treated
as a generator function.
Regards,
Frederik
On 26-02-2024 20:39, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
On 26/02/2024 19:02, Frederik Bosch wrote:
That's how it always has been, no? So in your example, short code
abbreviated form would not work. One has to write a blo
Hi Rowan,
On 26-02-2024 23:46, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
On 26/02/2024 20:21, Frederik Bosch wrote:
I do note that $this->propName might suggest that the backing value
is accessible from other locations than only the property's own
get/set methods, because of $this usage.
On 27-02-2024 10:49, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
On 26 February 2024 23:11:16 GMT, Frederik Bosch
wrote:
>And what happens in the following situation, how are multiple get
calls working together?
>
>public string $fullName {
> get => $this->first . '
options in which all the cookie
options will be moved into. More details are to be found in the RFC.
Hopefully, the samesite cookie flag will become a feature of the PHP
language through this RFC!
Kind regards,
Frederik Bosch
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
to protest. Things considered, I see no reason to change
the sentence.
Best,
Frederik
On 26-08-17 00:18, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
On 25 August 2017 at 22:19, Frederik Bosch wrote:
LS,
Just now, I opened the RFC on implementing same site cookies in PHP,
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/same-site-cookie
, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
On 25 August 2017 at 22:19, Frederik Bosch wrote:
LS,
Just now, I opened the RFC on implementing same site cookies in PHP,
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/same-site-cookie, for voting.
Please be explicit:
Proposed PHP Version(s)
next PHP 7.x
It's r
Hi Stanislav,
My reasoning for this is as follows.
1. The session_set_cookie_params function requires a lifetime parameter
at the moment.
2. To enforce that lifetime stays required I did not want to make it
required within the optional array. That would make that optional array
not optional
n the RFC, but it's open for over a month now.
I guess it can be closed.
Regards, Niklas
2017-08-25 23:19 GMT+02:00 Frederik Bosch <mailto:f.bo...@genkgo.nl>>:
LS,
Just now, I opened the RFC on implementing same site cookies in
PHP, https://wiki.php.net/rfc/same-sit
improving php source.
Kind regards,
Frederik Bosch
with the musl libc (Alpine) .
Checking it out... Probably this should be reported to bugs.php.net
<http://bugs.php.net> also...
On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 11:35, Frederik Bosch <mailto:f.bo...@genkgo.nl>> wrote:
Hi there,
As the release managers of PHP 7.3 h
Firefox (https://caniuse.com/#search=samesite). Major PHP
frameworks already implemented this through a custom Set-Cookie header
call. The RFC will try to convince voters that the samesite flag should
be implemented as a language feature.
Best regards,
Frederik Bosch
--
PHP Internals - PHP
.
Hopefully, the samesite cookie flag will become a feature of the PHP
language through this RFC!
Kind regards,
Frederik Bosch
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 18-07-17 12:37, Andrey Andreev wrote:
Hi Frederik,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Frederik Bosch | Genkgo
wrote:
LS,
Today I finished writing the RFC for implementing same site cookies in PHP,
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/same-site-cookie. I am happy to receive your
remarks on the propos
?
Frederik
On 18-07-17 15:45, Marco Pivetta wrote:
Hey Andrey,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Frederik Bosch | Genkgo
mailto:f.bo...@genkgo.nl>> wrote:
LS,
Today I finished writing the RFC for implementing same site
cookies in PHP, https://wiki.php.net/rfc/same-site-
Hi Andrey,
Thanks for you remark. If I understand correctly, PHP was 4-5 years
ahead of HttpOnly becoming an actual standard. What a leaders they were
back then.
Best,
Frederik
On 19-07-17 17:06, Andrey Andreev wrote:
Hi,
Not realizing I was looking at EOL dates, I (unintentionally) prov
January 2011 - just 3 months prior
to IETF RFC 6265 (April 2011) becoming a standards track.
PHP 5.2 was of course released way back, in 2006. My apologies for that.
Cheers,
Andrey.
--
Frederik Bosch
Partner
Genkgo logo
Mail: f.bo...@genkgo.nl <mailto:f.bo...@genkgo.nl&g
On 20-07-17 10:10, Frederik Bosch | Genkgo wrote:
LS,
All concerns that have been put forward are updated in the RFC
document. See https://wiki.php.net/rfc/same-site-cookie. I am going to
start the voting on August 1, 2017. Exactly two weeks after I posted
the RFC on the internals list. If
Hi Andrey,
While I agree on your statement that back-porting is suboptimal, I do
not agree on the fact that I said that there was no time to wait. I
submitted the RFC, awaited the opinions, changed the document according
to the different viewpoints and I link to the other RFC from this RFC. I
for
the array argument implementation ready. Taken that into account, we
should not want this in 7.2.
Best,
Frederik
On 28-08-17 17:58, Andrey Andreev wrote:
Hi Frederik,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Frederik Bosch | Genkgo
wrote:
Hi Andrey,
While I agree on your statement that back
24 matches
Mail list logo
