On 24/07/2025 08:51, Alexandre Daubois wrote:
>
> Indeed, a quick search in the code showed that in both cases, it seems
> there's only one or two occurrences for each. Let's keep it as-is
> then.
The context for XMLReader & XMLWriter is also a bit different.
"create" is not in the name because
Hi internals,
Voting is now open for this RFC.
* RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecated_traits
* Discussion thread: https://externals.io/message/127912
Voting will end 2025-08-07 at end-of-day UTC.
-Daniel
Hi internals,
Voting is now open for this RFC.
* RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/filter_throw_on_failure
* Discussion thread: https://externals.io/message/127911
Voting will end 2025-08-07 at end-of-day UTC.
-Daniel
Am 17.07.2025, 18:21:10 schrieb Daniel Scherzer :
> Hi internals,
>
> Voting is now open for this RFC.
>
> * RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/delayedtargetvalidation_attribute
> * Discussion thread: https://externals.io/message/127702
>
> Voting will end 2025-07-31 at end-of-day UTC.
>
> -Daniel
>
A
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025, at 4:13 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-07-23 16:05, schrieb Larry Garfield:
>> The only thing I'd add is that in the case of multi-option secondary
>> votes, STV/RCV also be explicitly allowed. (Rank first, second, third,
>> etc.). (I'm aware the mechanism for S
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025, at 4:28 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-07-23 17:34, schrieb Andreas Heigl:
>> As you point out, the abstain alone solves a me "problem". Changing the
>> process just for that, seems overkill to me.
>
> Requiring an "Abstain" option in the voting widget is a simple
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025, at 4:54 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-07-23 15:57, schrieb Larry Garfield:
>> What other changes there are unaccounted for? I thought we'd kept up
>> on the behavioral ones.
>
> The support for attributes (particularly #[\SensitiveParameter]) is not
> mentioned
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025, at 5:03 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> I did not yet have the time to check the changes and your reply in
> detail, but I already wanted to follow-up on some of the points.
>
> Am 2025-07-23 15:55, schrieb Larry Garfield:
>> $c = fn(string $s, Point $p, int $m = 0) => stuf
Hi
Am 2025-07-23 17:34, schrieb Andreas Heigl:
As you point out, the abstain alone solves a me "problem". Changing the
process just for that, seems overkill to me.
Requiring an "Abstain" option in the voting widget is a simple change to
the process. It does not require any additional effort f
Hi
I did not yet have the time to check the changes and your reply in
detail, but I already wanted to follow-up on some of the points.
Am 2025-07-23 15:55, schrieb Larry Garfield:
$c = fn(string $s, Point $p, int $m = 0) => stuff(1, $s, 3.14, $m);
I don't think this is accurate? `$p` is unu
Hi
Am 2025-07-24 12:03, schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
I don't think they should. Specifically the (1) and (3) should not. My
expectation is that:
$f = foo(a: ?, b: 2, c: ?);
$f(1, 3); // calls foo(1, 2, 3);
and
$f = foo(c: ?, b: 2, a: ?);
$f(1, 3); // calls foo(3, 2, 1);
The order
Hi
Am 2025-07-23 16:05, schrieb Larry Garfield:
The only thing I'd add is that in the case of multi-option secondary
votes, STV/RCV also be explicitly allowed. (Rank first, second, third,
etc.). (I'm aware the mechanism for STV is kinda clunky on the wiki
right now, but we know how to make i
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025, at 6:52 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-07-24 12:03, schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
>> I don't think they should. Specifically the (1) and (3) should not. My
>> expectation is that:
>>
>> $f = foo(a: ?, b: 2, c: ?);
>> $f(1, 3); // calls foo(1, 2, 3);
>>
>> and
>>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025, at 1:51 AM, Alexandre Daubois wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Le mer. 23 juil. 2025 à 17:41, Jakub Zelenka a écrit :
>> In addition it could be useful to create it from array or from class (sort
>> of auto generate schema)
>
> Writing schema by hand is painful, so that would be amazi
Good catch for multi-classes per file with such feature, but I think it's
not the time to do it.
As an alternative way to find the class is to look at the all files in the
namespace:
src/App/Controller/
IndexController.php
BlogController.php
IndexController.php contains
```
namespace
Hey,
On 21.7.2025 14:21:49, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
Hello internals,
I have started the vote for my "Deprecate type juggling to and from bool type within
the function type juggling context" RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate-function-bool-type-juggling
It will run for two weeks and close
Hi
Am 2025-07-23 15:57, schrieb Larry Garfield:
What other changes there are unaccounted for? I thought we'd kept up
on the behavioral ones.
The support for attributes (particularly #[\SensitiveParameter]) is not
mentioned in the RFC either. And as I mentioned yesterday, the observer
suppor
Hi Gina,
Le jeu. 24 juil. 2025 à 14:46, Gina P. Banyard a écrit :
>
> Hello internals,
>
> I'm mailing the list for the bike shed of the naming of a new constant I
> think we should introduce in PHP which I'm currently calling PHP_INT_MAX_SAFE.
> The purpose of this integer is to indicate what i
Hi Dmitry,
> On Jul 24, 2025, at 12:41, Dmitry Derepko wrote:
>
> Good catch for multi-classes per file with such feature, but I think it's not
> the time to do it.
...
> I think we should discuss the idea of the Short Constructor here. At least it
> does not require autoloading changes
Not
On 2-7-2025 21:56, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
Hello internals,
It is this time of year again where we proposed a list of deprecations to add
in PHP 8.5:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_5
As a reminder, this list has been compiled over the course of the past year by
various different
20 matches
Mail list logo