Hi Yuya
Am 2025-03-16 02:12, schrieb youkidearitai:
I created the RFC page for grapheme_levenshtein.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/grapheme_levenshtein
I would like go to voting at two weeks if any comment is nothing.
If any comment, feel free to comment.
My only comment would be that you forgot t
On 24 March 2025 09:20:03 GMT, "Alexandru Pătrănescu"
wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 5:20 PM Larry Garfield
>wrote:
>
>>
>> So, how would nested classes compare to fileprivate, in terms of ability
>> to solve the problem space? As I understand it, the goal is:
>>
>> 1. Classes that can be i
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, at 3:47 AM, Rob Landers wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2025, at 16:17, Larry Garfield wrote:
>> I've been following this thread with interest, and at the moment I'm
>> honestly undecided. I certainly see the use cases for this functionality
>> (whatever it gets named), but as a
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 11:22 AM Larry Garfield
wrote:
>
> To answer the original question: I'm not against this change, but as it is
> a syntax change, I think it does warrant an RFC, even if it's a small/easy
> one. That's a good way to flesh out the edge cases like that.
>
> --Larry Garfield
2025年3月25日(火) 3:21 Tim Düsterhus :
> Hi Yuya
>
> Am 2025-03-16 02:12, schrieb youkidearitai:
> > I created the RFC page for grapheme_levenshtein.
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/grapheme_levenshtein
> > I would like go to voting at two weeks if any comment is nothing.
> >
> > If any comment, feel fre
Hi internals,
I'd like to start the discussion for a new RFC about allowing final
promoted properties. You can see some preliminary discussion at <
https://externals.io/message/126475>, but this is now an official RFC.
* RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/final_promotion
* Implementation: https://gith
On 3/23/2025 11:10 AM, Larry Garfield wrote:
I'm not sure it justifies a new pseudo-function language construct.
Fair enough. Thank you for the feedback.
On 3/23/2025 2:37 PM, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
It's telling that all your examples with ?? put a value other than
null on the right-ha
>
> You're cheating again - you've put an extra pair of brackets around one
> expression and not the other, and assumed they'll work differently, but
that's
> not the grammar you proposed.
>
Why am I cheating?
> spawn (getClosure());
This is an honest statement, provided that the second parenthese
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 5:20 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
>
> So, how would nested classes compare to fileprivate, in terms of ability
> to solve the problem space? As I understand it, the goal is:
>
> 1. Classes that can be instantiated only by the class that uses them.
> 2. But can be returned fro
On 23.03.25 19:37, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
I'm sympathetic to the problem you're trying to solve - the precedence
of ?? isn't always helpful - but I'm not sure I like the proposed
solution, for 3 reasons.
1) The name "nullc" is over-shortened and cryptic. The "c" looks almost
like an acc
10 matches
Mail list logo
