Hi
[dropping Dennis from the Cc list]
Am 2025-02-21 13:06, schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
We already had extensive off-list discussion about the RFC and I agree
it's in a good shape now. I've given it another read and here's my
remarks:
One more thing that came to my mind, but where I'm not sure wha
-Original Message-
From: Tim Düsterhus
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2025 5:05 PM
To: Máté Kocsis
Cc: Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Add WHATWG compliant URL parsing
API
> Naming of `WhatWgError` and `WhatWgErrorType`. They are placed within the
`Uri\WhatWg` namespace
Hi all,
In earlier discussions on the [Server-Side Request and Response
objects](https://externals.io/message/108436) RFC and the [after-action
sumamry](https://externals.io/message/109563), one of the common non-technical
objections was that it would better be handled in userland.
Seeing as t
Hi Máté,
I've read the latest version of the RFC and while I very much like the RFC, I
have some remarks.
1.
The paragraph in at the beginning of the RFC in the > Relevant URI
specifications > WHATWG URL section seems to be incomplete.
2.
I don't really understand how the UninitializedUriExcep
On Sunday, 23 February 2025 at 17:57, Paul M. Jones wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In earlier discussions on the Server-Side Request and Response objects RFC
> and the after-action sumamry, one of the common non-technical objections was
> that it would better be handled in userland.
>
> Seeing as there
