Hi internals,
I've just opened the vote for the "PDO driver specific parsers" RFC. The
RFC contains a single vote which requires a 2/3 majority to pass. Voting
runs 2 weeks until 2024-06-17 15:00 UTC.
Please find the following resources for your references:
RFC Text: https://wiki.php.net/rfc
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:13 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
>
> So we feel the best way forward is to make the following changes:
>
> * private(set) implicitly means "final". (You can declare it explicitly
> if you want, but it isn't necessary.)
> * Make readonly incompatible with aviz again.
>
> Thou
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 2:24 AM Benjamin Außenhofer
wrote:
> The vote for the RFC #[\Deprecated] attribute is now open:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecated_attribute
>
> Voting will close on Wednesday 5th June, 08:00 GMT.
>
I have voted no for a few reasons:
- Ideally, I'd like to be able
Hi Matthew
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 3:15 PM Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 2:24 AM Benjamin Außenhofer
> wrote:
>>
>> The vote for the RFC #[\Deprecated] attribute is now open:
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecated_attribute
>>
>> Voting will close on Wednesday 5th
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 9:46 AM Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi Matthew
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 3:15 PM Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 2:24 AM Benjamin Außenhofer
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The vote for the RFC #[\Deprecated] attribute is now open:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.ph
On Sat, 1 Jun 2024, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
> On Friday, 31 May 2024 at 18:15, Larry Garfield
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2024, at 4:41 PM, Jorg Sowa wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Saki, I like this change. When I was implementing additional
> > > rounding modes for the next PHP version I was initial
On Fri, 31 May 2024, Saki Takamachi wrote:
> I would like to start an RFC discussion regarding rounding modes.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/correctly_name_the_rounding_mode_and_make_it_an_enum
I think it would be really helpful to have a description (and examples)
for each of the rounding modes i
On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 2:27 PM Jorg Sowa wrote:
> > It should also be noted that ceil/floor is very English specific
> terminology that may not be immediately obvious to non-English speakers,
> thus my preference for using some variation of towards positive/negative
> infinity.
>
> This statement
Hi
On 5/29/24 20:05, Derick Rethans wrote:
For each op_array, Xdebug tries to figure out every possible path by
following jumps. Certain opcodes, such as GENERATOR_RETURN, THROW,
RETURN, and EXIT [1] are considered as an exit point out of the
function. A path ends there.
You linked to a code_c
Hi
On 6/3/24 19:02, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
If the behavior of that mode is to ALWAYS round regardless of the value of
the remainder, then it should remain ceil IMO. It's a pretty well
understood behavior in many programming languages. However,
"HALF_TOWARDS_POSITIVE_INFINITY" is a different behavi
Hi
On 6/2/24 23:26, Jorg Sowa wrote:
Far more people search for `ceiling` than `round toward positive infinity`
or `round positive infinity`. Of course, I may be wrong by choosing
Could it be the case that folks do not need to search as much for
“towards positive infinity”, because in contras
Hi
On 6/3/24 18:21, Derick Rethans wrote:
But they're well established in existing PHP features.
That does not mean that we shouldn't attempt to do better for newly
introduced APIs. Over time there will be more developers that will newly
learn PHP than there are developers that already know
Hi Elminson!
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 6:51 PM Elminson De Oleo Baez wrote:
>
> I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request RFC karma for my
> wiki account in order to propose a new RFC.
>
> My proposal involves the introduction of two new methods, any_empty and
> all_empty, for w
Is it not already covered by array_any() and array_all() anyway? You can
just write a predicate if you want the (awful) semantics of empty().
Bilge
Hey Larry, hey Ilija
Am 29.05.24 um 21:15 schrieb Larry Garfield:
As promised, Ilija and I offer this revised version of asymmetric visibility.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/asymmetric-visibility-v2
It's still essentially the same as last year's version, but with a few
adjustments and changes:
*
15 matches
Mail list logo
