> Le 30 mai 2024 à 17:07, Derick Rethans a écrit :
>
>>
>> Now, if I define the property as public private(set) with similar
>> intentions, to make sure that there is no way for external scope or
>> extending classes scope to write to the property, while allowing
>> reading from external sc
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:30 AM Claude Pache
wrote:
>
>
> Le 30 mai 2024 à 17:07, Derick Rethans a écrit :
>
>
> Now, if I define the property as public private(set) with similar
> intentions, to make sure that there is no way for external scope or
> extending classes scope to write to the prop
> Le 30 mai 2024 à 12:16, Vincent de Lau a écrit :
>
>>
>> We went through a bunch of syntax variations last year, including "public
>> private", "public:private", and "public private:set", plus a few others.
>> In an RCV poll, public private(set) was the favorite. (See link at the end
>> of t
Hi, internals!
I would like to start an RFC discussion regarding rounding modes.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/correctly_name_the_rounding_mode_and_make_it_an_enum
As mentioned previously by Gina on the mailing list [1], there are some issues
with PHP's current rounding mode.
[1] - https://externals.
> To resolve these issues, change the naming to something appropriate and
use Enums instead of int constants.
Hi!
I like the idea. But I don't know
>From the RFC text:
> To summarize, existing features will be changed to a union type of int|
\RoundingMode, and unreleased features will only accept
Hi.
> I like the idea. But I don't know
Please ignore this.
Some copy-past leftovers.
Sorry!
On Fri, May 31, 2024, at 12:04 PM, Alexandru Pătrănescu wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:30 AM Claude Pache wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Le 30 mai 2024 à 17:07, Derick Rethans a écrit :
>>>
Now, if I define the property as public private(set) with similar
intentions, to make sure that
Hey Saki,
I like this change. When I was implementing additional rounding modes for
the next PHP version I was initially struggling with the naming and this
change will be helpful.
I have only one concern about the names `NegativeInfinity` and
`PositiveInfinity`. They may be too formal from the us
Thank you for the clarification Erick
Sent from IPhone
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:59 PM Erick de Azevedo Lima <
ericklima.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > I like the idea. But I don't know
> Please ignore this.
> Some copy-past leftovers.
>
> Sorry!
>
>
On Fri, May 31, 2024, at 4:41 PM, Jorg Sowa wrote:
> Hey Saki,
> I like this change. When I was implementing additional rounding modes
> for the next PHP version I was initially struggling with the naming and
> this change will be helpful.
>
> I have only one concern about the names `NegativeInfi
> Le 31 mai 2024 à 18:08, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>
> However, this also brings up another interesting issue: readonly properties
> (in 8.3) DO allow redeclaration, essentially adjusting the property scope
> (the class that declares it) to make the visibility check pass. That is, the
> defi
On Fri, May 31, 2024, at 5:45 PM, Claude Pache wrote:
>> Le 31 mai 2024 à 18:08, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>>
>> However, this also brings up another interesting issue: readonly properties
>> (in 8.3) DO allow redeclaration, essentially adjusting the property scope
>> (the class that declares it
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 9:13 PM Claude Pache wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 31 mai 2024 à 18:08, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>
> However, this also brings up another interesting issue: readonly properties
> (in 8.3) DO allow redeclaration, essentially adjusting the property scope
> (the class that declares it)
> Le 31 mai 2024 à 18:08, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>
> So we feel the best way forward is to make the following changes:
>
> * private(set) implicitly means "final". (You can declare it explicitly if
> you want, but it isn't necessary.)
> * Make readonly incompatible with aviz again.
>
> Th
> So we feel the best way forward is to make the following changes:
>
> * private(set) implicitly means "final". (You can declare it explicitly
if you want, but it isn't necessary.)
> * Make readonly incompatible with aviz again.
I'd make readonly incompatible with aviz. Readonly props have its
"
On Friday, 31 May 2024 at 18:15, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024, at 4:41 PM, Jorg Sowa wrote:
>
> > Hey Saki,
> > I like this change. When I was implementing additional rounding modes
> > for the next PHP version I was initially struggling with the naming and
> > this change will b
On Friday, 31 May 2024 at 15:49, Saki Takamachi wrote:
> Hi, internals!
>
> I would like to start an RFC discussion regarding rounding modes.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/correctly_name_the_rounding_mode_and_make_it_an_enum
>
> As mentioned previously by Gina on the mailing list [1], there ar
17 matches
Mail list logo
