Hi Máté,
> Le 30 mai 2023 à 01:41, Máté Kocsis a écrit :
>
> Hi Claude,
>
>> The replacement methods for IntlCalendar::set() (namely
>> IntlCalendar::setDate() and IntlCalendar::setDateTime()) must not have a
>> return type of `void`, but `true`, like the original method, for the two
>> foll
Hello all,As per the How To Create an RFC instructions, I am sending this e-mail in order to get your feedback on my proposal.I propose introducing a function to PHP core named `array_group`. This function takes an array and a function and returns an array that contains arrays - groups of consecuti
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 05:22, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 30 May 2023, at 07:48, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> >
> > Hello internals,
> > I am picking up an idea that was mentioned by Benjamin Eberlei in the past.
> > https://externals.io/message/110217#110395
> > (we probably had the idea indep
On 29/05/2023 19:29, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
I think this is a flawed premise: Any sort of analysis that PHP itself
performs can also be performed in userland.
This isn't actually true. There is a lot of dynamic functionality in PHP
where correctness can't be proven ahead of time, and run-time
Updated the patch: added a test about increasing subsequences example, and a minor bugfix.
array_group.patch
Description: Binary data
On 30.5.2023, at 13:34, Boro Sitnikovski wrote:Hello all,As per the How To Create an RFC instructions, I am sending this e-mail in order to get your feedback on my
(Resending to the list without all the history because qmail complained about
message size)
>>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I too have wondered (and I think asked in room11?) about such a concept.
>> >From memory the general response was “just do it in userland with a
>> wrapper” so its good to see
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 15:14, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
> (Resending to the list without all the history because qmail complained about
> message size)
>
>
> >>
> >> Hi Andreas,
> >>
> >> I too have wondered (and I think asked in room11?) about such a concept.
> >> >From memory the general response
Hi
On 5/29/23 17:41, Nikita Popov wrote:
I don't think we should deprecate mt_rand().
There are plenty of use-cases that require neither a seedable (predictable) RNG
sequence, nor a cryptographically-secure RNG. For those use-cases (and
especially one-off uses), mt_rand() is perfect, and goin
Hello Boro,
I think you should include the "expected result" in your code examples.
Maybe this is in your patch file, but I don't think we want to look at
that for discussion.
Cheers
Andreas
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 13:35, Boro Sitnikovski wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As per the How To Create an RFC
Hey,
Thanks for the suggestion.
For the previous case in the code, I added these in a Gist to not clutter here
too much:
1. The first example corresponds to
https://gist.github.com/bor0/b5f449bfe85440d96abd933b9f03b310#file-test_manual_group-php
2. The second example corresponds to
https://gi
2023年5月30日(火) 4:49 Tim Düsterhus :
> Hi
>
> On 5/29/23 08:44, Go Kudo wrote:
> > I realized I was about to add the deprecation of `lcg_value()` and forgot
> > to do so, so I added it.
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_3#global_combined_lcg
> >
> > As usual, my English is of low q
Hi
On 5/30/23 17:52, Go Kudo wrote:
> It should be deprecated with PHP 8.4 at the earliest to give folks at
least
Indeed, I agree that `lcg_value()` should be deprecated at least in PHP 8.4.
However, `lcg_value()` remains a dangerous function. It still has a weak
initial seeding problem (PID
Thank you, this clarifies and it confirms my initial assumption of
what you are proposing.
So you want to slice an array by comparing adjacent values.
My personal feedback:
I think the need for the grouping behavior you describe is not common
enough that it needs its own native function.
I would
Here we go,
https://3v4l.org/KsL3o
function array_group(array $arr1, callable $compare): array {
$groups = [];
$group = [];
$prev = NULL;
foreach ($arr1 as $value) {
if ($group && !$compare($prev, $value)) {
$groups[] = $group;
$group = [];
>In my opinion, deprecating this does not do anything besides annoying
users.
In my opinion, since it isn't, and likely never was, a legal ISO8601
string, it's a no-brainer that it should be deprecated. (it's at least
been illegal since iso8601:2004 released in 2004)
On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 12:17,
Hi,
Thank you for your thoughts.
> I would say the more common desired behavior is the one in your first
> example. And even for that we don't have a native function.
This Google search might give more insight into the number of discussions about
a grouping functionality:
https://www.google.co
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 18:27, Boro Sitnikovski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your thoughts.
>
> > I would say the more common desired behavior is the one in your first
> > example. And even for that we don't have a native function.
>
> This Google search might give more insight into the number
On Mon, May 29, 2023, at 11:22 PM, Máté Kocsis wrote:
> Hi Michał and Larry,
>
> As Tim has already clarified, using literal strings in the left-hand side
> of "clone with expressions" won't cause any issues
> for IDEs and static analysers to identify the correct property. I got rid
> of the shorth
--
Larry Garfield
la...@garfieldtech.com
On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 2:42 AM, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> Hello list,
> this proposal will be useful in combination with "Declaration-aware
> attributes"
>
>
> Problem
>
> Currently, ReflectionMethod is not aware of the original class, i
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 18:48, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> Larry Garfield
> la...@garfieldtech.com
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 2:42 AM, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > this proposal will be useful in combination with "Declaration-aware
> > attributes"
> >
> >
> > Problem
>
Hi
On 5/30/23 18:37, Larry Garfield wrote:
To be honest, the current behavior seemed like the natural choice for
me, and I didn't really consider to execute the __clone() method after the
clone assignments.
Do you have a use-case in mind when you need to forward-pass information to
__clone()?
On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 2:49 PM, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 15:14, Stephen Reay wrote:
>>
>> (Resending to the list without all the history because qmail complained
>> about message size)
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Andreas,
>> >>
>> >> I too have wondered (and I think asked in ro
--
Larry Garfield
la...@garfieldtech.com
On Mon, May 29, 2023, at 8:28 PM, Claude Pache wrote:
>> Le 8 mai 2023 à 23:38, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>>
>> Ilija Tovilo and I would like to offer another RFC for your consideration.
>> It's been a while in coming, and we've evolved the desig
On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 4:27 PM, Boro Sitnikovski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your thoughts.
>
>> I would say the more common desired behavior is the one in your first
>> example. And even for that we don't have a native function.
>
> This Google search might give more insight into the number o
Hi,
> On 30.5.2023, at 18:33, Andreas Hennings wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 18:27, Boro Sitnikovski wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for your thoughts.
>>
>>> I would say the more common desired behavior is the one in your first
>>> example. And even for that we don't have a native func
> On 30.5.2023, at 19:21, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 4:27 PM, Boro Sitnikovski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for your thoughts.
>>
>>> I would say the more common desired behavior is the one in your first
>>> example. And even for that we don't have a native function.
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 19:12, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> I've run into this issue in my attribute library as well
> (https://github.com/Crell/AttributeUtils). What I do there is allow
> attributes to opt-in to a callback method via interface. For example:
>
> #[\Attribute]
> class AttribWithNam
On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 7:34 PM, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 19:12, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>
>> I've run into this issue in my attribute library as well
>> (https://github.com/Crell/AttributeUtils). What I do there is allow
>> attributes to opt-in to a callback method via
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 22:45, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 7:34 PM, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 19:12, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >>
> >> I've run into this issue in my attribute library as well
> >> (https://github.com/Crell/AttributeUtils). What I do
On Tue, May 30, 2023, 19:39 Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023, at 11:22 PM, Máté Kocsis wrote:
> > To be honest, the current behavior seemed like the natural choice for
> > me, and I didn't really consider to execute the __clone() method after
> the
> > clone assignments.
> > Do you ha
On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 10:04 PM, Alexandru Pătrănescu wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023, 19:39 Larry Garfield wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 29, 2023, at 11:22 PM, Máté Kocsis wrote:
>> > To be honest, the current behavior seemed like the natural choice for
>> > me, and I didn't really consider to execute
> On 30.5.2023, at 21:56, Andreas Hennings wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 19:25, Boro Sitnikovski wrote:
>>
>> Here's some more examples:
>>
>> 1. Use `array_group` to create list of singleton list:
>> ```
>> $groups = array_group( $arr, function( $p1, $p2 ) {
>> return false;
>> } );
>>
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 2:53 AM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 10:04 PM, Alexandru Pătrănescu wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023, 19:39 Larry Garfield
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 29, 2023, at 11:22 PM, Máté Kocsis wrote:
> >> > To be honest, the current behavior seemed like the
33 matches
Mail list logo
