fwiw i think no self-respecting codebase is depending on an ini-setting
being correct for the ua in cases where the ua is actually important, so
the breakage should be minimal.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 09:25, Aleksander Machniak wrote:
> On 27.06.2021 08:48, Michael Maroszek wrote:
> > That's what
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:45 AM Hans Henrik Bergan
wrote:
> fwiw i think no self-respecting codebase is depending on an ini-setting
> being correct for the ua in cases where the ua is actually important, so
> the breakage should be minimal.
>
>
In my mind, this is either an argument in favor of ei
>
> or doing nothing at all.
>
Sounds good to me.
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 16:47, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:45 AM Hans Henrik Bergan
> wrote:
>
>> fwiw i think no self-respecting codebase is depending on an ini-setting
>> being correct for the ua in cases where the ua is actua