""Steven Hilder"" wrote in message news:op.y09fz0b4twp9n2@charlie...
Tony,
On 30 May 2017 11:21:38 +0300, Tony Marston
wrote:
they should not be forced to change just because some nerd has made a
unilateral decision which is way above his pay grade
On 30 May 2017 16:18:21 +0300, Tony Mars
2017-05-29 22:29 GMT+02:00 Anatol Belski :
> Hi Niklas,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Niklas Keller [mailto:m...@kelunik.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 10:14 PM
> > To: Anatol Belski
> > Cc: Nikita Popov ; PHP Internals
> >
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Improved SSL /
Am 04.06.2017 um 11:10 schrieb Tony Marston:
If there was never a standard to begin with then there should be proper
justification for introducing one now, and I'm afraid that "to be
consistent" is not a valid argument. What problems are caused by this
inconsistency? What is the cost, both in
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your comments.
Le 03/06/2017 à 15:34, Dan Ackroyd a écrit :
However as you declined to respond on Github, I'll ask here again:
I am sorry to say that I didn't decline anything, as you never commented
the PR. It seems I didn't reply to questions you didn't ask :). I also
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> I would like to propose the addition of openssl_pkcs7_read and extending
> openssl_pkcs7_verify to also return a PKCS7 structure. The reasoning for
> the addition of these functions is the requirement at work to obtain the
> CA certific
On 06/04/17 at 07:00pm, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose the addition of openssl_pkcs7_read and extending
> > openssl_pkcs7_verify to also return a PKCS7 structure. The reasoning for
> > the addition of these functions
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 06/04/17 at 07:00pm, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jelle van der Waa
> wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to propose the addition of openssl_pkcs7_read and
> extending
> > > openssl_pkcs7_verify to also return
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:17 PM, François Laupretre wrote:
> I don't know if it is still time for 7.2 but here is a new RFC to read and
> comment :
>
Official feature freeze (and branch fork) is Jun 20. Ideally get
things merged before then, but there's wiggle room for open/voting
RFCs.
> https:/
