[PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Christoph M. Becker
Hi! The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, 31th[1]. Does that mean that there'll be no further release with "normal" bug fixes (but only security fixes)? [1] -- Christoph M. Becker -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developm

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Kalle Sommer Nielsen
Hi On Dec 14, 2016 12:23, "Christoph M. Becker" wrote: > > Hi! > > The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, > 31th[1]. Does that mean that there'll be no further release with > "normal" bug fixes (but only security fixes)? Yes, 5.6 was extended to compensate for 5-

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Niklas Keller
2016-12-14 12:23 GMT+01:00 Christoph M. Becker : > Hi! > > The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, > 31th[1]. Does that mean that there'll be no further release with > "normal" bug fixes (but only security fixes)? > > [1] > I

[PHP-DEV] Looking for Z_TYPE_PP in all the wrong places.

2016-12-14 Thread Richard Quadling
Hi. I'm trying to find the replacement for Z_TYPE_PP (and several other Z_xxx_PP). It seems these are no longer present in PHP7. But, according to http://lxr.php.net/source/search?q=&defs=&refs=Z_TYPE_PP&path=&hist=&type=&project=PHP-MASTER, there is still 1 use case of this particular macro. S

Re: [PHP-DEV] Looking for Z_TYPE_PP in all the wrong places.

2016-12-14 Thread Michael Wallner
On 14/12/16 14:17, Richard Quadling wrote: > Hi. > > I'm trying to find the replacement for Z_TYPE_PP (and several other > Z_xxx_PP). > > It seems these are no longer present in PHP7. In PHP-7, you usually do not encounter zval**, so the _PP macros were gone. Try _P(*zval) instead. > > But, ac

Re: [PHP-DEV] Looking for Z_TYPE_PP in all the wrong places.

2016-12-14 Thread Christoph M. Becker
On 14.12.2016 at 14:32, Michael Wallner wrote: > On 14/12/16 14:17, Richard Quadling wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I'm trying to find the replacement for Z_TYPE_PP (and several other >> Z_xxx_PP). >> >> It seems these are no longer present in PHP7. > > In PHP-7, you usually do not encounter zval**, so the

[PHP-DEV] UGLY Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2016-12-13

2016-12-14 Thread lp_benchmark_robot
Results for project PHP master, build date 2016-12-13 20:29:05-08:00 commit: 9bcd2bc previous commit:675fc9e revision date: 2016-12-14 03:12:46+01:00 environment:Haswell-EP cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2, LLC 45 MB

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 12/14/2016 06:35 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: Hi On Dec 14, 2016 12:23, "Christoph M. Becker" wrote: Hi! The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, 31th[1]. Does that mean that there'll be no further release with "normal" bug fixes (but only security fixes)

Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][DISCUSSION] - Immutable classes and properties

2016-12-14 Thread Andrea Faulds
Hi, Paul Jones wrote: On Dec 12, 2016, at 13:36, Andrea Faulds wrote: Consider that some popular applications of immutability ultimately contain a reference to something mutable: PSR-7's immutable HTTP message objects point to mutable streams Which subverts its overall promise of immutab

Re: [PHP-DEV] Looking for Z_TYPE_PP in all the wrong places.

2016-12-14 Thread Richard Quadling
On 14 December 2016 at 14:37, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > On 14.12.2016 at 14:32, Michael Wallner wrote: > > > On 14/12/16 14:17, Richard Quadling wrote: > >> Hi. > >> > >> I'm trying to find the replacement for Z_TYPE_PP (and several other > >> Z_xxx_PP). > >> > >> It seems these are no longer

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Davey Shafik
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 12/14/2016 06:35 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Dec 14, 2016 12:23, "Christoph M. Becker" wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, >>> 31th[1]. Does that mean

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Christoph M. Becker
On 14.12.2016 at 14:05, Niklas Keller wrote: > 2016-12-14 12:23 GMT+01:00 Christoph M. Becker : > >> The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, >> 31th[1]. Does that mean that there'll be no further release with >> "normal" bug fixes (but only security fixes)? >> >> [1

RE: [PHP-DEV] Looking for Z_TYPE_PP in all the wrong places.

2016-12-14 Thread Anatol Belski
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Wallner [mailto:mike.php@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Michael > Wallner > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 2:33 PM > To: rquadl...@gmail.com; PHP internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Looking for Z_TYPE_PP in all the wrong places. > > On 14/12/16 14:17

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread David Zuelke
On 14.12.2016, at 16:15, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 12/14/2016 06:35 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Dec 14, 2016 12:23, "Christoph M. Becker" wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, >>> 31th[1]. Does that mean that th

RE: [PHP-DEV] PaX MPROTECT / W^X protection

2016-12-14 Thread Anatol Belski
Hi Christoph, > -Original Message- > From: Christoph M. Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de] > Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 4:01 PM > To: Joe Watkins ; Anatol Belski > > Cc: PHP internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PaX MPROTECT / W^X protection > > An update regarding the PaX MPROTEXT / W^

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Dennis Clarke
PHP 5.6 isn't EOL for a further two years, you should be fine. Thank you so much. I can only guess this is posted on a "lifetime" page somewhere on php.net but I didn't see it. Dennis -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsu

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Marco Pivetta
See https://secure.php.net/supported-versions.php On 14 Dec 2016 9:29 p.m., "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > > >> >> PHP 5.6 isn't EOL for a further two years, you should be fine. >> >> > Thank you so much. I can only guess this is posted on a "lifetime" page > somewhere on php.net but I didn't see it.

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 12/14/2016 01:29 PM, David Zuelke wrote: On 14.12.2016, at 16:15, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 12/14/2016 06:35 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: Hi On Dec 14, 2016 12:23, "Christoph M. Becker" wrote: Hi! The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, 31th[1]. Does t

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 12/14/2016 03:31 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote: See https://secure.php.net/supported-versions.php I see. I guess the question has to be "why is the 5.6.x codebase only to receive security fixes for a very brief while into 2017" ? Just curious what the thinking is here. Dennis -- PHP Intern

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Nikita Popov
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 12/14/2016 03:31 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote: > >> See https://secure.php.net/supported-versions.php >> > > I see. > > I guess the question has to be "why is the 5.6.x codebase only to receive > security fixes for a very brief while into 2017

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Ryan Pallas
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 12/14/2016 03:31 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote: > >> See https://secure.php.net/supported-versions.php >> > > I see. > > I guess the question has to be "why is the 5.6.x codebase only to receive > security fixes for a very brief while into 2017

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Andrea Faulds
Hi, Dennis Clarke wrote: This is entirely too soon. At the present moment neither of the PHP 7.0 releases will compile clean on a strict POSIX environment. At all. The version 5.6.x tree is perfectly stable and works out of the box without an endless compile nightmare whereas 7.0.14 and 7.1.0 wo

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 12/14/2016 03:48 PM, Nikita Popov wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 12/14/2016 03:31 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote: See https://secure.php.net/supported-versions.php I see. I guess the question has to be "why is the 5.6.x codebase only to receive security fixes

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Dennis Clarke
Perhaps the gcc compiler is an absolute requirement and if that is true then the code isn't acceptable to any other compiler regardless if it is C99 compliant or otherwise. GCC is not a requirement. At the very least, PHP compiles on clang and MSVC, and I believe it works with some other compi

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Niklas Keller wrote: > 2016-12-14 12:23 GMT+01:00 Christoph M. Becker : > >> Hi! >> >> The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, >> 31th[1]. Does that mean that there'll be no further release with >> "normal" bug fixes (but only secur

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 end of active support

2016-12-14 Thread Alice Wonder
On 12/14/2016 02:29 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Niklas Keller wrote: 2016-12-14 12:23 GMT+01:00 Christoph M. Becker : Hi! The end of active support for PHP 5.6 is documented to be on December, 31th[1]. Does that mean that there'll be no further release with "n