Yasuo Ohgaki schrieb am Di., 4. Okt. 2016, 03:54:
> Hi Davey,
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Davey Shafik wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 2, 2016, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki
> wrote:
> >> > Besides improving "more entropy" th
Yasuo Ohgaki schrieb am Di., 4. Okt. 2016, 04:43:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stanislav Malyshev
> wrote:
> > I've just discovered that wordwrap() (http://php.net/wordwrap) accepts
> > negative width parameter and treats it as if it was 0. It looks like a
> > bug, never documented and wor
Marco Pivetta schrieb am Sa., 1. Okt. 2016, 15:27:
> At the moment, the fact that it raises a fatal due to __toString()
> limitations is a problem. Probably good to delay or RFC it.
>
You mean if errors are converted to exceptions? If you do that, deprecation
warnings should usually not be conver
Den 2016-10-02 kl. 23:12, skrev Rowan Collins:
Hi internallers!
No, you haven't misread the subject line, I'm not talking about the
exciting new HTTP/2, but HTTP/1.1, 20 years old this year.
To my surprise, PHP's HTTP stream wrapper (e.g.
file_get_contents('http://example.com');) defaults t
Hi everybody
I'd like to propose the introduction of warning when counting objects that
can't be counted.
The default behaviour is to return 1 for these objects, which can be
misleading and hide bugs when attempting to count iterable objects (eg
Generators). Adding a warning would alert developer
On 4 October 2016 at 02:39, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi Leigh,
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Leigh wrote:
>> I'm curious, did you consider using random_int? It already handles
>> biasing, and you can reduce the repeated calls to random_bytes.
>
> Yes. It seemed it might be slower due to number
On 4 October 2016 at 10:32, Craig Duncan wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> I'd like to propose the introduction of warning when counting objects that
> can't be counted.
>
> The default behaviour is to return 1 for these objects, which can be
> misleading and hide bugs when attempting to count iterable ob
On 4 October 2016 at 11:17, Leigh wrote:
> You specifically mention that counting scalars is unaffected, is there
> a legitimate use-case for being able to use count() on them?
>
> I'd say using count() on a string or an int also constitutes a hidden
> bug, as it also always returns 1 regardless
Hi everybody,
I have an application where a small file is included at multiple places.
So far so good.
The problem is that this include consists in a small piece of code which is
inside a multi-level loop.
The include is done about an average of 100.000 times .
When I manually rep
On 04.10.2016 at 01:13, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 03/10/16 22:20, Rowan Collins wrote:
>
>> On 3 October 2016 19:11:52 BST, Adam Baratz wrote:
>>
Test script:
---
$db = new PDO(...);
$stmt = $db->prepare("SELECT :null");
$stmt->bindValue(':null', null, PDO
>
> >> Well, I'm pretty sure Postgres won't be affected either way, because
> its type system is such that you can't prepare a query where the types of
> parameters can't be decided yet. A query like this simply gives an error.
> >
> > Firebird, oracle and mysql would have exactly the same problem.
Hi,
On 04/10/2016 16:15, Adam Baratz wrote:
>>
Well, I'm pretty sure Postgres won't be affected either way, because
>> its type system is such that you can't prepare a query where the types of
>> parameters can't be decided yet. A query like this simply gives an error.
>>>
>>> Firebird, oracl
On 2016-10-04 14:33, Pascal KISSIAN wrote:
I have an application where a small file is included at multiple
places.
The include is done about an average of 100.000 times .
I'm just wondering if you have ever heard of functions? You really
should write a function, include it only once, and th
On 04.10.2016 at 16:15, Adam Baratz wrote:
Well, I'm pretty sure Postgres won't be affected either way, because
>> its type system is such that you can't prepare a query where the types of
>> parameters can't be decided yet. A query like this simply gives an error.
>>>
>>> Firebird, oracle an
On 04.10.2016 at 16:20, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/10/2016 16:15, Adam Baratz wrote:
>>>
> Well, I'm pretty sure Postgres won't be affected either way, because
>>> its type system is such that you can't prepare a query where the types of
>>> parameters can't be decided yet. A query
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Lauri Kenttä [mailto:lauri.ken...@gmail.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 16:21
>À : Pascal KISSIAN
>Cc : internals@lists.php.net
>Objet : Re: [PHP-DEV] Feature Request: inline pseudo-instruction
>
>On 2016-10-04 14:33, Pascal KISSIAN wrote:
>> I have an appli
>
> > Well, I'm pretty sure Postgres won't be affected either way, because
> >>> its type system is such that you can't prepare a query where the types
> of
> >>> parameters can't be decided yet. A query like this simply gives an
> error.
>
> Firebird, oracle and mysql would have exac
On 04.10.2016 at 16:44, Adam Baratz wrote:
That's correct, but you can enable emulated prepares for whichever
driver.
A less confusing example might've been inserting :null into a nullable
INT
column and verifying that NULL was stored.
>>>
>>> That's not ture. If memory se
Hi,
On 04/10/2016 16:33, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 04.10.2016 at 16:20, Matteo Beccati wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04/10/2016 16:15, Adam Baratz wrote:
>> Well, I'm pretty sure Postgres won't be affected either way, because
its type system is such that you can't prepare a query w
On 04.10.2016 at 17:00, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> If you grep from PDO_ATTR_EMULATE_PREPARES you won't find anything in
> core using it other than the mysql/pgsql drivers.
>
> It's more or less a missing feature in the other drivers.
>
> Back to the main topic, I agree it is a bug but we'd need to
On 10/4/2016 4:33 AM, Pascal KISSIAN wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have an application where a small file is included at multiple places.
So far so good.
The problem is that this include consists in a small piece of code which is
inside a multi-level loop.
The include is done about an average of 100
On 10/4/2016 7:33 AM, Pascal KISSIAN wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : Lauri Kenttä [mailto:lauri.ken...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 16:21
À : Pascal KISSIAN
Cc : internals@lists.php.net
Objet : Re: [PHP-DEV] Feature Request: inline pseudo-instruction
On 2016-10-04 14:33, Pas
> Am 4.10.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Pascal KISSIAN :
>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : Lauri Kenttä [mailto:lauri.ken...@gmail.com]
>> Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 16:21
>> À : Pascal KISSIAN
>> Cc : internals@lists.php.net
>> Objet : Re: [PHP-DEV] Feature Request: inline pseudo-instruction
2016-10-04 17:39 GMT+02:00 Bob Weinand :
>
> > Am 4.10.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Pascal KISSIAN :
> >
> >> -Message d'origine-
> >> De : Lauri Kenttä [mailto:lauri.ken...@gmail.com]
> >> Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 16:21
> >> À : Pascal KISSIAN
> >> Cc : internals@lists.php.net
> >> Objet :
On 04.10.2016 at 13:33, Pascal KISSIAN wrote:
> I have an application where a small file is included at multiple places.
>
> So far so good.
>
> The problem is that this include consists in a small piece of code which is
> inside a multi-level loop.
>
> The include is done about an average of 1
Hi,
On 04.10.16 11:32, Craig Duncan wrote:
> I'd like to propose the introduction of warning when counting objects that
> can't be counted.
>
> The default behaviour is to return 1 for these objects, which can be
> misleading and hide bugs when attempting to count iterable objects (eg
> Generator
Hello list,
It is my intention to create a new PECL package for ext/mcrypt, so
that it can be removed from master as per the RFC
(https://wiki.php.net/rfc/mcrypt-viking-funeral)
I do not expect there to be any updates to the extension after it has
been migrated, however we voted to move it there.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Craig Duncan wrote:
> On 4 October 2016 at 11:17, Leigh wrote:
>
> > You specifically mention that counting scalars is unaffected, is there
> > a legitimate use-case for being able to use count() on them?
> >
> > I'd say using count() on a string or an int also c
On 4 October 2016 at 18:10, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> A confounding factor is that count() has an alias sizeof() and for people
> coming from a C-like background it is quite natural to try to apply
> sizeof() to a string in order to get its length. This will silently "work",
> but return a meaningl
« tell me what you need, and I would tell you how to do without it » is a
nonsense answer for me…
I just told you about one among several cases where I found the need for such a
feature.
I can also tell you, by example, of a specific grammar driven php writen parser
where about 100 funct
Results for project PHP master, build date 2016-10-04 06:25:04+03:00
commit: 3f04ee0
previous commit:82a8e57
revision date: 2016-10-03 18:39:20-07:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
Hi all,
A couple weeks back I took a look at 72811[1]. The bug being that
parse_url() didn't accept IPv6 addresses without a scheme, like it did for
IPv4 addresses. I attempted to patch the specific bug within the scope of
how parse_url() was processing URI's. After opening a PR for the
resouti
On Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Pascal KISSIAN > wrote:
> « tell me what you need, and I would tell you how to do without it » is a
> nonsense answer for me…
>
>
>
> I just told you about one among several cases where I found the need for
> such a feature.
>
>
>
And you've been told that functions an
Hi,
On 10/04/2016 01:33 PM, Pascal KISSIAN wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have an application where a small file is included at multiple places.
So far so good.
The problem is that this include consists in a small piece of code which is
inside a multi-level loop.
The include is done about an a
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Pascal KISSIAN
wrote:
> >-Message d'origine-
> >De : Lauri Kenttä [mailto:lauri.ken...@gmail.com]
> >Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 16:21
> >À : Pascal KISSIAN
> >Cc : internals@lists.php.net
> >Objet : Re: [PHP-DEV] Feature Request: inline pseudo-instructi
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ryan Pallas wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Pascal KISSIAN
> wrote:
>
>> >-Message d'origine-
>> >De : Lauri Kenttä [mailto:lauri.ken...@gmail.com]
>> >Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 16:21
>> >À : Pascal KISSIAN
>> >Cc : internals@lists.php.ne
Hi!
> What does drop mean? Return false and issue a warning? Keep current
Yes, false + warning.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@gmail.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 16:04 Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been bouncing this idea of fixing all comparison operations in one
> fell swoop, although with an opt-in declare in the spirit of strict_types.
>
> So, I thought about this for a while, and decided against doing this RFC
mys
38 matches
Mail list logo