Hello.
I have created RFC about context-dependent escaping operator.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator
Initial discussion was here: http://marc.info/?t=14661919911
At first, I wanted to add a call of special function like
escaper_call($str, $context), which performs html-escaping by
if I see it correctly, this is just a framework for defining callbacks to a
escaping operator, without a implementation of "html" and "js"?
Not sure if this helps.
Regards
Thomas
Michael Vostrikov wrote on 16.07.2016 17:33:
> Hello.
> I have created RFC about context-dependent escaping operator
> if I see it correctly, this is just a framework for defining callbacks to
a escaping operator, without a implementation of "html" and "js"?
> Not sure if this helps.
There is a default escaping for HTML. If there is no registered handler for
'html' context, it calls htmlspecialchars($str, ENT_QUO
Hi Michael,
On 16 July 2016 at 16:33, Michael Vostrikov wrote:
> Hello.
> I have created RFC about context-dependent escaping operator.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator
>
> Initial discussion was here: http://marc.info/?t=14661919911
I'm more than slightly sceptical about this RF
2016-07-16 11:33 GMT-04:00 Michael Vostrikov :
>
> Hello.
> I have created RFC about context-dependent escaping operator.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator
>
> Initial discussion was here: http://marc.info/?t=14661919911
Hi,
A few possible RFC improvements:
1. Is there any specif
> It would be better to return the previous handler, or NULL if one
> wasn't set, in the same way as set_error_handler() does, and for the same
reasons.
Well, maybe you are right.
But I thought, this is not a use case, usually we don't need multiple
handlers for certain context. I.e. we don't need
>
> 1. Is there any specific reason why we're using a class instead of
> functions to register a callable the same way it's done for exception
> handling or error handling? Hacking non FQN resolutions to inject another
> escaper ...
>
I would not call it 'hacking') This is exaclty the same as if w
