On 31/01/16 02:42, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> It's ok to reject a RFC by "I don't think it is not needed" for simple
> additions like array_find_recursive() - it's imaginably RFC. However,
> it is not ok for some change/addition like mine
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/precise_session_management
> This RFC
Den 2016-01-20 kl. 21:42, skrev Thomas Punt:
Hi internals!
Voting has opened for the inclusion of a digit separator in PHP[1]. Voting ends
in
one week's time on January 20th.
Voting has now ended with 20 for and 18 against. This means the RFC has been
declined.
Thank you to all who participa
Den 2016-01-30 kl. 18:34, skrev Andrea Faulds:
Hi everyone,
The vote on the OpenSSL AEAD RFC[1] has made me question our current
RFC process again. Under the Voting RFC[2], "Language changes" (in
practice, changes to syntax and semantics) require at least a 2/3
majority to pass when they come
Den 2016-01-28 kl. 15:48, skrev Anatol Belski:
Hi,
I'm writing to ask for a review on the following:
https://gist.github.com/weltling/29779b61db26c62b5ab0
It is quite far from being even near to be ready. It is an approach for the
streams refactoring. After some time playing around, I think th
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:45 PM, François Laupretre
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Starting discussion about https://wiki.php.net/rfc/negative-string-offsets
>
> Please read and comment.
>
Just dropping by with a +1 on this proposal. Consistent support is always
good.
The only concern I have is that support
Hi!
> The only concern I have is that support of negative indexing will break
> symmetry with (proper) arrays, where we cannot support negative indexing.
I think that was the main source of objections to this proposal in the
past. However, as one might say, string offsets are already not
symmetri
Hi!
> Consequences
> - If script executes session_commit()/session_destroy()/use read only
> option, PHP will not perform GC. i.e. GC function is not called at
> all. Therefore, probability of GC decreases and GC becomes less
> likely.
> - If script uses multiple session storage, only the last s
Hi Stas,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> Consequences
>> - If script executes session_commit()/session_destroy()/use read only
>> option, PHP will not perform GC. i.e. GC function is not called at
>> all. Therefore, probability of GC decreases and GC becomes less
>>
Morning internalz,
RFC's aren't a good fit for changing procedure, but it's all we have.
This should be the first non-language change RFC that requires a 2/3
majority, I think.
+1 from me anyway, good points have already been made.
Cheers
Joe
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Yasuo
