Hi Dmitry,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2015 9:34 AM
> To: Anatol Belski
> Cc: Matt Ficken ; Pierre Joye
> ; Anatoliy Belsky ; Laruence
> ; PHP Internals ; dmi...@php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Windows OpCache bug fix
Hi all,
I once suggested to some core developers to offer « clone » the same syntax as
« new » has since 5.4.
The idea being to be able to write this kind of code:
$foo = new Foo;
$bar = (clone $foo)->someMethod();
It seemed that this would not be that difficult to implement, and I was told
t
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Gauthier Delamarre
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I once suggested to some core developers to offer « clone » the same
> syntax as « new » has since 5.4.
>
> The idea being to be able to write this kind of code:
>
> $foo = new Foo;
> $bar = (clone $foo)->someMethod();
>
> It
Le jeudi 1 octobre 2015, 15:19:20 Tom Worster a écrit :
> Do people here agree that PHP should have a *policy* of using a consistent
> Unicode version?
I agree with this, seems like a fair request.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/u
Hello,
2015-10-01 21:19 GMT+02:00 Tom Worster :
>
> Do people here agree that PHP should have a *policy* of using a consistent
> Unicode version?
>
> This appears to be easy to accomplish for the moment. Moving to Unicode 8
> will be harder.
>
I agree with the policy -> good idea.
But I think th
Tom Worster wrote on 03/10/2015 21:33:
when the grammar starts with function(args), it seems the main
difference from existing grammar is to make the curly braces when
there's only one statement in the function block.
in other contexts i had the impression that things like
if (bool-expr)
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Anatol Belski
wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 2, 2015 9:34 AM
> > To: Anatol Belski
> > Cc: Matt Ficken ; Pierre Joye
> > ; Anatoliy Belsky ; Laruence
> > ; PHP Intern
Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-10-05 05:13:19+03:00
commit: 746b37e2d551c89d25364ffefee19445651f93d6
revision_date: 2015-10-05 00:57:30+02:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping
2, LLC 45 MB
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 1:08 PM
> To: Anatol Belski
> Cc: Matt Ficken ; Pierre Joye
> ; Laruence ; PHP Internals
> ; dmi...@php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Windows OpCache bug fix
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Anatol Belski wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 1:08 PM
> > To: Anatol Belski
> > Cc: Matt Ficken ; Pierre Joye
> > ; Laruence ; PHP Internals
> > ; dmi...@php.net
> > Subje
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> I screwed up sending this earlier. Sorry if you get this twice.
>
> On 9/30/15 12:15 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
>> I think random_bytes() and random_int() are great; they provide a
>> much-needed building block in PHP 7.0. However, I do worry
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 3:31 PM
> To: Anatol Belski
> Cc: Matt Ficken ; Pierre Joye
> ; Laruence ; PHP Internals
> ; dmi...@php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Windows OpCache bug fix
>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [
On 10/5/15, 11:34 AM, "Scott Arciszewski" wrote:
>
>You mentioned diceware. Incidentally,
>https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/07/common-uses-for-csprngs-cryptographical
>ly-secure-pseudo-random-number-generators#diceware
>
>Some problems (i.e. random_int) should be fixed at a language level.
>Others,
On 10/5/15 5:20 AM, Martin Keckeis wrote:
Hello,
2015-10-01 21:19 GMT+02:00 Tom Worster :
Do people here agree that PHP should have a *policy* of using a consistent
Unicode version?
This appears to be easy to accomplish for the moment. Moving to Unicode 8
will be harder.
I agree with the p
Dan Ackroyd wrote on 29/09/2015 15:25:
Hello internals,
Here is a draft RFC to make the callable type in PHP be consistent and
have much fewer surprises.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/consistent_callables
To break the silence: I really like the sentiment behind this, and it
seems very thorough. I
>From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
>
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Matt Ficken
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Pierre Joy wrote:
>>> And what wincache does. It is slower but the request is served.
>>
>> WinCache (file cache) if it can't reattach, creates a new shared mem
>> file
>
> I'm not su
On 4 October 2015 23:10:25 BST, somebody anon
wrote:
>Hi PHP community. I am a developer with few years experience in PHP and
>now
>want to propose some addition to default "filesystem" extension.
>There's
>money_format and number_format functions to format money and number
>values
>in human-read
Ultimately if the 2nd OpCache is shared in a new SHM, in-process in a new
SHM or in-process Heap, memory will increase, scripts have to be recompiled
and there are consistency issues. File-cache will avoid recompiling
scripts, but unless OpCache is disabled, there needs to be a 2nd OpCache
stored s
18 matches
Mail list logo