[PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6.11 RC1 is available for testing

Hello PHP 5.6.11 RC1 is available for testing. You can download it from http://downloads.php.net/~tyrael/ The Windows binaries are available at http://windows.php.net/qa/ This release contains a number of bugfixes. For the list of bugfixes that you can target in your testing, please refer to t

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5.5.27RC1 is available

Hello PHP 5.5.27 RC1 is available for testing. You can download it from http://downloads.php.net/~jpauli/ The Windows binaries are available at http://windows.php.net/qa/ This release contains a number of bugfixes. For the list of bugfixes that you can target in your testing, please refer to t

Re: [PHP-DEV] Deprecating ldap_sort

Zitat von Andreas Heigl : Hi Anatol. Côme already replied to the technical aspects of what we are trying to do. Am 25.06.15 um 17:56 schrieb Anatol Belski: Hi Andreas, -Original Message- From: Andreas Heigl [mailto:andr...@heigl.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:40 PM To: inter

Re: [PHP-DEV] New PHP SAPI for Nginx

>Tons of things in PHP or in libraries called by PHP are > blocking Yes, it's not a problem, thread pools for use blocking processes do not block the main process Nginx. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] New PHP SAPI for Nginx

On 26 June 2015 at 06:39, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On 06/25/2015 01:31 PM, S.A.N wrote: > > New versions Nginx, implement thread pools, > > http://nginx.com/blog/thread-pools-boost-performance-9x/ > > > > I think this is a good opportunity to write a Nginx module (PHP SAPI) > > which is to process

Re: [PHP-DEV] Deprecating ldap_sort

Hi all. Am 25.06.15 um 17:56 schrieb Anatol Belski: > Any feedback from the ldap users were appreciated here, as well. * https://github.com/smalot/ldap uses ldap_sort, issue is raised * https://github.com/matgou/GorgLdapOrmBundle uses ldap_sort, informed the maintainer via email Cheers Andreas

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 7.0.0alpha2 Released for Testing!

Remi Collet in php.internals (Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:38:12 +0200): >For me, the safe way was to rebuild "all" extensions against alpha2. I always do that: https://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?t=6617 With this as example phpinfo: https://phpdev.toolsforresearch.com/php-7.0.0alpha2-Win32-VC14-x8

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Executor cleanup: fix GOTO and SWITCH VMs, remove aility to build additional PHP-5.0 compatible VM, hide executor implementation details.: Zend/zend_compile.h Zend

Hi Derick, You shouldn't use opcode handlers directly, we have a use USER_OPCODE API. typedef int (*user_opcode_handler_t) (zend_execute_data *execute_data); #define ZEND_USER_OPCODE_CONTINUE 0 /* execute next opcode */ #define ZEND_USER_OPCODE_RETURN 1 /* exit from executor (return from f

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.6.11 RC1 is available for testing

Ferenc Kovacs in php.internals (Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:22:14 +0200): >PHP 5.6.11 RC1 is available for testing. > >You can download it from > >http://downloads.php.net/~tyrael/ > >The Windows binaries are available at http://windows.php.net/qa/ > >This release contains a number of bugfixes. The Window

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.6.11 RC1 is available for testing

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Ferenc Kovacs in php.internals (Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:22:14 +0200): > >PHP 5.6.11 RC1 is available for testing. > > > >You can download it from > > > >http://downloads.php.net/~tyrael/ > > > >The Windows binaries are available at http://window

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: adding next-minor and next-major versions to the bugtracker

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Maciej Sobaczewski wrote: > W dniu 2015-06-23 o 14:07, Ferenc Kovacs pisze: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to add two new PHP versions to the bugtracker, which can be >> used for target version for feature requests. >> Currently filling that out is mandatory, so we h

[PHP-DEV] Re: Improved zend_string API

Hi Francois, >From the source code review, I don't see any problems. May be too aggressive usage of inline functions in zend_string implementation, but I hope, it shouldn't make any harm. I'll need to check, if C compilers are smart enough to produce good optimized code after inlining. In general

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: adding next-minor and next-major versions to the bugtracker

2015-06-26 12:43 GMT+02:00 Ferenc Kovacs : > anybody else has any opinion on the matter? Just go for it, I would welcome such very much when dwelling intro the bug tracker -- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen ka...@php.net -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, vi

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Executor cleanup: fix GOTO and SWITCH VMs, remove aility to build additional PHP-5.0 compatible VM, hide executor implementation details.: Zend/zend_compile.h Zend

On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > You shouldn't use opcode handlers directly, we have a use USER_OPCODE API. > > typedef int (*user_opcode_handler_t) (zend_execute_data *execute_data); > > #define ZEND_USER_OPCODE_CONTINUE 0 /* execute next opcode */ > #define ZEND_USER_OPCODE_RETURN

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Executor cleanup: fix GOTO and SWITCH VMs, remove aility to build additional PHP-5.0 compatible VM, hide executor implementation details.: Zend/zend_compile.h Zend

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > > > You shouldn't use opcode handlers directly, we have a use USER_OPCODE > API. > > > > typedef int (*user_opcode_handler_t) (zend_execute_data *execute_data); > > > > #define ZEND_USER_OPCODE_CO

RE: [PHP-DEV] Headsup: PHP7 feature freeze

Hi, https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1367 implements some additions to the zend_string API I'd like to see in 7.0. It's important, IMHO, because it provides macros to access the 'val' and 'len' fields of the zend_string struct, which didn't exist previously. Because of this, we already have

Re: [PHP-DEV] Headsup: PHP7 feature freeze

Hi all, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Hi Hannes, > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Hannes Magnusson < >> hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Why do you think its undocumented? >>> http://php.net/manua

Re: [PHP-DEV] Headsup: PHP7 feature freeze

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > I don't think session internal names do not have to be changed. I meant "I think session internal names do not have to be changed". I don't mind at all cleanup them. -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net

[PHP-DEV] RE: Improved zend_string API

Hi, I’ve checked the patch and tested the build, both looks fine. Though I would go by the suggestion from Dmitry about the new inlined functions. At least VC produces same ASM, probably gcc would produce good results as well. However, to operate just on one struct member a function looks

[PHP-DEV] RFC: Initialize objects by using an object initializer.

Hello, I tried to register in RFC Wiki but I get the error "That wasn't the answer we were expecting", but in all cases, I'm David Rodrigues, and I like to suggest a method to initialize objects by using an object initializar. Currently it is supported on C# -- read here

Re: [PHP-DEV] Move to Fast ZPP?

Hi Dmitry, all, - Original Message - From: "Dmitry Stogov" Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Matt Wilmas wrote: Hi Dmitry, all, - Original Message - From: "Dmitry Stogov" Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 We should NOT use it everywhere. It'll lea

Re: [PHP-DEV] Move to Fast ZPP?

Hi Levi, - Original Message - From: "Levi Morrison" Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: Hi all, I'm wondering the state of Fast ZPP. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fast_zpp Last year's

Re: [PHP-DEV] Wiki access for ihabunek

On Jun 26, 2015 12:18 AM, "Ivan Habunek" wrote: > > Hi Kalle & co, > > On 25 June 2015 at 18:12, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > > Do you have a draft or something similar we (we being the Windows > > team) can take a look at before handing out the write access? > > Not yet. I can draft it over the