On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 11/01/2015 10:37, Remi Collet a écrit :
> > Le 08/01/2015 18:30, Julien Pauli a écrit :
> >> Hello
> >
> >> PHP 5.5.21 RC1 is available for testing.
> >
> > Trying to understand why Horde_
On 01/11/2015 06:05 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Also, FWIW, anyone who used the Suhosin patch couldn’t use srand()
>> because it disabled it.
>
> And? You can disable any function in PHP, that doesn't mean anything.
>
>> Because if we don’t break it, people will continue to rely on
Hi Rasmus,
> On 12 Jan 2015, at 09:06, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> Yes, there is plenty of code out there that relies on srand()+rand()
> returning a repeatable sequence of pseudo-random numbers. I have written
> some myself. C devs are very familiar with this behaviour of srand.
C devs are also
> On 12 Jan 2015, at 09:31, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Hi Rasmus,
>
>> On 12 Jan 2015, at 09:06, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>
>> Yes, there is plenty of code out there that relies on srand()+rand()
>> returning a repeatable sequence of pseudo-random numbers. I have written
>> some myself. C devs ar
Hey
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>
> does master of josnd already works with PHP7?
>
>
There is a patch against PHP master that replaces current json ext. I
referenced a branch of my PHP fork in RFC.
I have just created a PR as well to make it a bit easier if you or other
De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Also I am really not a fan of yaml&co to generate C code but having critical
parts in C and everything else in straight php :)
I don't use yaml to generate C, just to define metadata, like extension name,
arguments/return value characteristics, etc
> De : p...@golemon.com [mailto:p...@golemon.com] De la part de Sara
> Golemon
> Why so limited? Like, why disallow objects completely? That feels
> like a big step backward for PHP. Any why not computed constants?
> (Assuming they stay constant throughout the process lifetime)
This is not what
Hey:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> Hey
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>>
>>
>> does master of josnd already works with PHP7?
>>
>
> There is a patch against PHP master that replaces current json ext. I
> referenced a branch of my PHP fork in RFC
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:58 AM, François Laupretre
wrote:
> I am not crazy about it either, I just want to generate code for
> argument parsing (removing every access to zval, dealing with
> 'mixed' type, checks...), return value (convert to zval, maybe a
> pair of checks), and the global 'glue'
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> While I could work on this in the dark, manipulating HHVM's APIs with
> one hand and adding proxy interfaces to PHP (as an extension) with the
> other, I'd much rather have involvement from others.
>
Apropos of collaborating, who's going to be
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> Unfortunately, I don't see performance improvement in wordpress. even
> slowdown a bit.
>
> for IRs , it increased IR by 0.05% while run wordpress homepage for 100
> times :<
>
> do you think there is some room to be improvement?
>
> thanks
>
Hi Andrea,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> > On 12 Jan 2015, at 00:55, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> >
> > It works, but I prefer to have procedural API also (and OO API if it is
> needed.)
> > I like multi paradigm programming language.
>
> I don’t see the point of a “procedur
Hi!
>> - To produce a repeatable sequence of random numbers (works, but
>> only if you and the sole user of the global random number
>> generator, which is not guaranteed by any means)
If you write your code it is guaranteed. Note that it's not some API
we're designing out of the blue, it is some
I fail at reply to all.
On 12 January 2015 at 16:52, Leigh wrote:
> On 12 January 2015 at 09:31, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>> - To produce a repeatable sequence of random numbers (works, but only if you
>> and the sole user of the global random number generator, which is not
>> guaranteed by any m
On 01/12/2015 01:31 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
>> On 12 Jan 2015, at 09:06, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>
>> Yes, there is plenty of code out there that relies on srand()+rand()
>> returning a repeatable sequence of pseudo-random numbers. I have written
>> some myself. C devs are very fam
Hi all,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Anthony Ferrara
wrote:
> It's worth nothing that failing is the currently documented behavior:
> http://php.net/crypt
>
> Therefore, I'm suggesting we add an E_DEPRECATED error when we detect
> an invalid STD_DES salt but still execute the fallback:
> htt
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> While I could work on this in the dark, manipulating HHVM's APIs with
>> one hand and adding proxy interfaces to PHP (as an extension) with the
>> other, I'd much rather have involvement
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:58 AM, François Laupretre
> wrote:
>> I am not crazy about it either, I just want to generate code for
>> argument parsing (removing every access to zval, dealing with
>> 'mixed' type, checks...), return value (conve
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hey internals,
>
> As we’re moving to clean some things up in PHP 7, I think it might be worth
> looking at the rand()/mt_rand() situation.
>
> Currently, we have two standard-library functions to obtain a random number:
> rand() and mt_ran
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> I am all in favor of having new RNG functions to make it easier and
> safer to use RNG with PHP.
>
Let's have it for PHP 7!
What's the status of your new crypt extension?
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
Hey:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't see performance improvement in wordpress. even
>> slowdown a bit.
>>
>> for IRs , it increased IR by 0.05% while run wordpress homepage for 100
>> times :
> De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>
> > Apropos of collaborating, who's going to be around FOSDEM/PHPBenelux
> > that would like to come up with a plan for this project?
I'd love to but I can't afford. I am not a PHP professional, I would have to
pay it by myself.
But I am OK for
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:38 PM, François Laupretre
wrote:
>> De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>>
>> > Apropos of collaborating, who's going to be around FOSDEM/PHPBenelux
>> > that would like to come up with a plan for this project?
>
> I'd love to but I can't afford. I am not a PHP
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> Hey:
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I don't see performance improvement in wordpress. even
>>> slowdown a bit.
>>>
>>> for IRs , it incre
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:38 PM, François Laupretre
wrote:
>> Failing either of those venues, how about a Hangout or similar to hash
>> out goals and ideas at a bit better bandwidth? Reply with best
>> dates/times for this latter option.
>
> Sorry, I don't know what a 'hangout' is, as I am quite
> De : p...@golemon.com [mailto:p...@golemon.com] De la part de Sara Golemon
>
> Okay, but why even generate code for argument parsing? Why not just
> pass the arguments/return-values as their concrete type?
Because I am beyond what macros can do. Actually, I don't see how I can do what
I have in
> De : p...@golemon.com [mailto:p...@golemon.com] De la part de Sara
> Golemon
>
> Yeah, it's an audio/video group conferencing type thing. Thinking to
> use that for the initial kickoff so that we can pick a general
> direction (or a few options) to build from.
OK. I am available everyday, prefe
27 matches
Mail list logo
