On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, François Laupretre wrote:
> > De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>
> > 2. We have no easy way to actually release and deploy adhoc scripts,
> > used by a given extension
> >
> > For 2., it is one of the thing I can imagine implementing in pickle.
> > Or even bette
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> > But, if we consider the PHP code as an integral part of the
> > extension, this should be avoided, as C and PHP code need to be kept
> > in sync.
>
> Again, there is a multitude of solutions for this, all in the realm of
> packaging. It's not l
Hi,
On Jan 7, 2015 5:02 PM, "Derick Rethans" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, François Laupretre wrote:
>
> > > De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
> >
> > > 2. We have no easy way to actually release and deploy adhoc scripts,
> > > used by a given extension
> > >
> > > For 2., it is one
On Jan 7, 2015 5:15 PM, "Derick Rethans" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
> > > But, if we consider the PHP code as an integral part of the
> > > extension, this should be avoided, as C and PHP code need to be kept
> > > in sync.
> >
> > Again, there is a multitude of sol
Hello,
Would it be possible for php.net to publish a cryptographically signed
(e.g. openssl_sign() with a RSA private key kept offline) list in a
pre-defined location (e.g. /stable_versions.txt) so that scripts can be
written to read (and cache) the latest stable versions?
I'm going to write a ki
On 7 January 2015 at 12:52, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would it be possible for php.net to publish a cryptographically signed
> (e.g. openssl_sign() with a RSA private key kept offline) list in a
> pre-defined location (e.g. /stable_versions.txt) so that scripts can be
> written to read
(cross-posting to php-webmaster as well)
On 7 January 2015 at 04:52, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
> Would it be possible for php.net to publish a cryptographically signed
> (e.g. openssl_sign() with a RSA private key kept offline) list in a
> pre-defined location (e.g. /stable_versions.txt) so that s
> That said, if you're OK trusting HTTPS and can do without the manual
signing step,
I'm not and cannot. After Diginotar and the Snowden revelations, I place
zero trust in CAs. :)
> we have an unadvertised JSON backend that can provide
> the stable release information you'd need:
> https://php.ne
Hello everyone,
After discussion I am putting the RFC on turning gc_collect_cycles into a
function pointer to vote:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/gc_fn_pointer
Votes will end on 2015-01-21 19:31 (in 14 days).
The discussion feedback on PHP 7 extension API refactoring was incorporated
in the RFC with
> De : Leigh [mailto:lei...@gmail.com]
>
> On 7 January 2015 at 12:52, Scott Arciszewski
> wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible for php.net to publish a cryptographically signed
> > (e.g. openssl_sign() with a RSA private key kept offline) list in a
> > pre-defined location (e.g. /stable_versions.
Hi!
>> https://php.net/releases/active.php. This is used by the bug tracker
>> in conjunction with pulling version information from qa.php.net, so it
>> should be reliable.
>
> Excellent! This is a wonderful starting point :)
Note also that while this API does not list it, every release now also
I'd like to start an RFC (see the draft proposal at the end of this
message) for adding
journald support to PHP on Linux systems that use systemd. This message
is to
measure reaction to the intended proposal prior to requesting RFC karma.
Proof of concept implementation against PHP master br
> De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>
> ... here,
> it is proposed to bundle scripts that will be executed at runtime like any
> other script, except that nothing can be done with them, not even disable
> them if not required (like using its own glue codes).
I agree. Bundling scripts
I really like the new name and the consistence with the rest of php. If no
one else has a complain about it I will update the RFC and open for voting,
right?
Juan Basso
On Jan 5, 2015 7:31 AM, "Ferenc Kovacs" wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Juan Basso wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Everyone
Hi!
> There is currently no way to install an extension and a PHP library
> package at the same time. "pecl" can't install PHP libraries, and
Why it needs to be "at the same time"? I don't see any use case where it
would matter if you run one command or two commands to install it. In
fact, if i
hi François,
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:14 PM, François Laupretre wrote:
>> De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>>
>> ... here,
>> it is proposed to bundle scripts that will be executed at runtime like any
>> other script, except that nothing can be done with them, not even disable
>>
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> "composer" can't install extensions. And even if it did, keeping the
>> versions in sync is not easy at all. Only way to solve this properly is
>
> It seems to me you're reinventing packaging systems. I don't see why we
> should invent
Hi,
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 17:01 -0500, Mark Montague wrote:
> I'd like to start an RFC (see the draft proposal at the end of this
> message) for adding
> journald support to PHP on Linux systems that use systemd. This message
> is to
> measure reaction to the intended proposal prior to requesti
On 07/01/2015 01:44, Andrea Faulds wrote:
The voting widget and RFC can be found here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php57
Hi,
We've discussed this RFC with other members of AFUP and while opinions
have been expressed for both "yes" and "no", it seems we are at about
2/3 of "yes" -- which means
19 matches
Mail list logo