On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Rowan Collins wrote:
> On 27/10/2013 15:51, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
>> Unless we have *concrete* plans regarding PHP 6 saying "this should go
>> into (a hypothetical, non-existing) PHP 6" is roughly equivalent to just
>> declining the feature.
Not sure where Nikita
On 27/10/2013 15:51, Nikita Popov wrote:
The question is always "how big is the break?" not "is there a
break?". The latter question doesn't even make sense because any
change to PHP - including the most trivial bugfixes - breaks
compatibility to *some* degree (well, unless the change is "fix
