On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> With regard to any sort of hinting, an issue of 'one of' return types
>> would need to be addressed (I hope).
>>
>> function foo(SomeClass $bar, int $baz) : bool, SomeClass {}
>>
>> Allowing for a failure (False) or a success (SomeClass).
>>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Patrick ALLAERT
wrote:
> Hello Florin,
>
> 2013/7/10 Florin Patan :
>> Since you brought up the discussion, would you think it would make
>> more sense to actually start and integrate HHVM into PHP rather that
>> patching it up?
>> Or better yet, rewrite it with a
Hi!
> Thanks for your input Sara, everything sounds very interesting. In all
> fairness I haven't looked at HHVM but I from what you described about
> this particular feature sounds good.
>
> Should I conclude that there's enough interest for this feature and
> move from a gist to a RFC? If so, I
Hey,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Thanks for your input Sara, everything sounds very interesting. In all
>> fairness I haven't looked at HHVM but I from what you described about
>> this particular feature sounds good.
>>
>> Should I conclude that there's enough
> While HHVM is a very interesting project, their use case is pretty
> specific and narrow, and, as I understand, connected to a single
> application (albeit running huge traffic numbers). So I'm not sure
> copying whatever they do is necessarily good for PHP as a whole. HHVM
> case is basically st
> Should I conclude that there's enough interest for this feature and
> move from a gist to a RFC? If so, I would definitely need someone to
> help out with the implementation.
>
> Without wanting to put the cart too far before the horse, I'll mention
that FB is willing to offer resources (me, basi
Hi!
> 1) HHVM isn't just running FB. A number of sites have either already
started using HHVM, or intend to soon.
Were could I read about those?
> 2) The "static compilation" description is grossly outdated information.
I guess my knowledge about HHVM is a bit out of date, which is no wonder
a
If you run into issues (yes, our build system still sucks a bit) poke me in
IRC freenode/#hhvm (or ptarjan or any other @ in that channel).
And just to jump in front of what I detect in your comment "albiet compile
it". Repeat: HHVM is not a code translator anymore. Hasn't been for
awhile now.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> I won't suggest that PHP should follow HHVM, if anything I'll usually (and
> have frequently) rallied for the other way around. In this case, however,
> as with Generators, I think that we should endeavor to keep the
> implementations close
>
> > 1) HHVM isn't just running FB. A number of sites have either already
> started using HHVM, or intend to soon.
>
> Were could I read about those?
>
> I didn't list any because I don't know how they individually feel about
sharing that info. I realize that takes the wind out of my statement,
I agree 100%.
This particular item has been in the works since before I joined the team
and I've given them a bollocking out over it. You may have noticed
UConverter and a few other changes which WERE proposed to internals@ prior
to inclusion in HHVM and the implementation of those features were
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> I agree 100%.
>
> This particular item has been in the works since before I joined the team
> and I've given them a bollocking out over it. You may have noticed
> UConverter and a few other changes which WERE proposed to internals@ prior
> t
> @Sara: thank you for the offer, I'll send you a mail, if it's ok with
> you, in the next days, I'd want to make this as a tutorial and maybe
> me implement it with your guidance, but more on this another time.
>
> Sure thing. PHP needs more developers with deep understanding of the
engine. I'd
On 7/11/13 2:56 PM, Florin Patan wrote:
We already have a bunch of RFCs about strict typing in PHP:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/typechecking
So I personally am not sure we need yet another RFC on the topic - given
that we discussed previous ones multiple times.
You are right, as part of the mov
The PHP development team announces the immediate availability of PHP
5.3.27. About 10 bugs were fixed, including a security fix in the XML
parser (Bug #65236).
Please Note: This will be the last regular release of the PHP 5.3
series. All users of PHP are encouraged to upgrade to PHP 5.4 or PHP
5.5
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:45:02 +0200
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> Please Note: This will be the last regular release of the PHP 5.3
> series. All users of PHP are encouraged to upgrade to PHP 5.4 or PHP
> 5.5. The PHP 5.3 series will receive only security fixes for the next
> year.
The exact date of
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 08:10 +0900, Kenji Suzuki wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:45:02 +0200
> Johannes Schlüter wrote:
>
> > Please Note: This will be the last regular release of the PHP 5.3
> > series. All users of PHP are encouraged to upgrade to PHP 5.4 or PHP
> > 5.5. The PHP 5.3 series will
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 02:47:34 +0200
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 08:10 +0900, Kenji Suzuki wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:45:02 +0200
> > Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> >
> > > Please Note: This will be the last regular release of the PHP 5.3
> > > series. All users of PHP are
18 matches
Mail list logo
