Hi Keyur,
On 07/02/13 06:40, Keyur Govande wrote:
Hello,
I've created a new RFC to improve support for setting a CLI process' title
on Linux. It is based off of the PostgreSQL implementation and is more
robust than the proctitle extension.
More details and patch here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc
Am 2013-02-07 08:45, schrieb Alexey Zakhlestin:
On 07.02.2013, at 9:40, Keyur Govande wrote:
Hello,
I've created a new RFC to improve support for setting a CLI process' title
on Linux. It is based off of the PostgreSQL implementation and is more
robust than the proctitle extension.
More det
On 7 February 2013 09:37, Christoph Rosse wrote:
> Am 2013-02-07 08:45, schrieb Alexey Zakhlestin:
>
>>
>> On 07.02.2013, at 9:40, Keyur Govande wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've created a new RFC to improve support for setting a CLI process'
>>> title
>>> on Linux. It is based off of the Postgre
There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may want
to take a look at that.
http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
On 7 February 2013 05:40, Keyur Govande wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've created a new RFC to improve support for setting a CLI process' title
> on Linux. It is bas
Am 06.02.13 14:14, schrieb Gabriel Wu:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I think mentioning Sara as a sponsor would weight in more than myself. ;)
Oh, you aren't the one approving the application?
Anyway I was wondering how to go about submitting the update - are
there
> great, that someone is updating this extension. will you also offer an
> updated version for php-5.5 later (if it does not already work)? i just
> wanted to give it a try, but there seems to be a problem with the uploaded
> package: it seems to only contain the "package.xml"?
% tar -i
--
Rega
Am 07.02.13 11:40, schrieb Michael Wallner:
great, that someone is updating this extension. will you also offer an
updated version for php-5.5 later (if it does not already work)? i just
wanted to give it a try, but there seems to be a problem with the uploaded
package: it seems to only contain t
On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh wrote:
> There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may want
> to take a look at that.
>
> http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
Did you read RFC?
Keyur mentions it and its limitations there
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
https://github.com/indey
On 7 February 2013 12:22, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
>
> On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh wrote:
>
> > There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may
> want
> > to take a look at that.
> >
> > http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
>
> Did you read RFC?
> Keyur mentions it and
On 7 February 2013 13:33, Leigh wrote:
> On 7 February 2013 12:22, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh wrote:
>>
>> > There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may
>> want
>> > to take a look at that.
>> >
>> > http://pecl.php.net/package/proc
On 07.02.2013, at 16:33, Leigh wrote:
> Why does this need to be in core? This could just be done as a set of
> improvements to the existing PECL extension instead. I'd guess that the
> number of people who require (and would use) this functionality is very very
> small indeed.
well, 2 reaso
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Harald Lapp wrote:
> Am 07.02.13 11:40, schrieb Michael Wallner:
>
>>> great, that someone is updating this extension. will you also offer an
>>> updated version for php-5.5 later (if it does not already work)? i just
>>> wanted to give it a try, but there seems to
Am 2013-02-07 13:33, schrieb Leigh:
On 7 February 2013 12:22, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh wrote:
There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may
want
to take a look at that.
http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
Did you read RFC?
Keyu
Am 2013-02-07 14:00, schrieb Alexey Zakhlestin:
On 07.02.2013, at 16:33, Leigh wrote:
Why does this need to be in core? This could just be done as a set of
improvements to the existing PECL extension instead. I'd guess that the number
of people who require (and would use) this functionality
Hello internals.
I'm actually using proctitle extension and it's very handy because we run
like 10+ daemons written in PHP that we manage. Without it we would be lost
:) But the actual awareness of the proctitle PECL extension is very low.
Also it does not work on windows.
I'm all over the idea to
Am 2013-02-07 14:57, schrieb Christoph Rosse:
Am 2013-02-07 14:00, schrieb Alexey Zakhlestin:
On 07.02.2013, at 16:33, Leigh wrote:
Why does this need to be in core? This could just be done as a set of
improvements to the existing PECL extension instead. I'd guess that
the number of people w
I have a confirmed bug with Intel Engineering. For clarification
purposes here, it only happens on 64-bit bit versions of icc and
possibly only on Linux. If you link against the math library using
`-lm` then this goes away at the cost of performance (though a
negligible cost I would guess).
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Christoph Rosse wrote:
> why wouldn't this go into core? setting the name of the current
> php-process is definitely something everyone that develops php-cli scripts
> could use.
>
I use a lot of php-cli scripts and I've never seen the need. Without having
hard data
Addressing a bunch of comments at once:
1) I've removed is_available and renamed the set/get methods to:
cli_process_title_set/get. I've also removed the test dependencies on pcntl
and posix. The patch is updated: https://gist.github.com/keyurdg/4728770
2) Updated the RFC's introduction section wit
On 02/07/2013 10:25 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Christoph Rosse wrote:
>
>> why wouldn't this go into core? setting the name of the current
>> php-process is definitely something everyone that develops php-cli scripts
>> could use.
>>
> I use a lot of php-cli scripts
20 matches
Mail list logo
