On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> For PHP we would need to have some similar behavior. PHP's current
>> exception model is incompatible with GeneratorExitException (because
>> PHP does not have BaseExceptions). So what I'd probably do instead is
>> monkeypatch a ZEND
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Raymond Irving wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What could have cause PHP to start out so great but then slows to a crawl?
> Could it be the GC?
>
> Number of iterations Node.js PHP
> ---
> 100
Am 19.08.2012 00:20, schrieb Andrew Faulds:
On 18/08/12 03:36, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
On 08/19/2012 10:29 AM, Raymond Irving wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What could have cause PHP to start out so great but then slows to a crawl?
> Could it be the GC?
>
> Number of iterations Node.js PHP
> ---
> 100 2.00
Many thanks for the feedback.
__
Raymond
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 08/19/2012 10:29 AM, Raymond Irving wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What could have cause PHP to start out so great but then slows to a
> crawl?
> > Could it be the GC?
> >
> > Number of iterations N
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> >
> >> For PHP we would need to have some similar behavior. PHP's current
> >> exception model is incompatible with GeneratorExitException
> >> (because PHP does not have BaseExceptions). So what
On 19/08/12 17:03, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
For PHP we would need to have some similar behavior. PHP's current
exception model is incompatible with GeneratorExitException
(because PHP does not have Bas
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Stas Malyshev
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> For PHP we would need to have some similar behavior. PHP's current
>> >> exception model is incompatible with GeneratorExitEx
2012/8/18 Rasmus Lerdorf :
> On 08/17/2012 05:21 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>> if(($key = array_search($del_val, $messages)) !== false) {
>>> unset($messages[$key]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> Nothing horrible here.
>>>
>>
>> I disagree - this is (or should be) a simple, atomic operation...
>> yet, you'
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> 2012/8/18 Rasmus Lerdorf :
>> On 08/17/2012 05:21 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
if(($key = array_search($del_val, $messages)) !== false) {
unset($messages[$key]);
}
Nothing horrible here.
>>>
>>> I disagree
2012/8/20 Etienne Kneuss :
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>> 2012/8/18 Rasmus Lerdorf :
>>> On 08/17/2012 05:21 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
>
> if(($key = array_search($del_val, $messages)) !== false) {
> unset($messages[$key]);
> }
>
> Nothing ho
Hi!
> I am against this. This is even more magic in PHP. Is it really that
> difficult to have to mark the function with a different keyword, such as
> "generator":
You have a point here, but "public static final generator function
foo()" sounds a bit long-winded to me... Also, we'd have then t
On 20/08/12 00:05, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
2012/8/20 Etienne Kneuss :
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
2012/8/18 Rasmus Lerdorf :
On 08/17/2012 05:21 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
if(($key = array_search($del_val, $messages)) !== false) {
unset($messages[$key]);
}
Nothing
2012/8/20 Andrew Faulds :
> On 20/08/12 00:05, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/20 Etienne Kneuss :
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki
>>> wrote:
2012/8/18 Rasmus Lerdorf :
>
> On 08/17/2012 05:21 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>> if(($key = array_sear
On 20/08/12 00:16, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
2012/8/20 Andrew Faulds :
On 20/08/12 00:05, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
2012/8/20 Etienne Kneuss :
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki
wrote:
2012/8/18 Rasmus Lerdorf :
On 08/17/2012 05:21 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
if(($key = array_search($del_val
On 08/19/2012 07:07 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I am against this. This is even more magic in PHP. Is it really that
>> difficult to have to mark the function with a different keyword, such as
>> "generator":
>
> You have a point here, but "public static final generator function
> foo()
> -Original Message-
> From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
> Sent: 20 August 2012 00:08
> To: Derick Rethans
> Cc: Nikita Popov; PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Generators
>
> Hi!
>
> > I am against this. This is even more magic in PHP. Is it
> really tha
It's also worth noting that a billion iterations is a lot in any language,
not just PHP. Plus most browsers would probably blow-up in your face if
you tried to send that much data.
--Kris
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Raymond Irving wrote:
> Many thanks for the feedback.
>
> __
> Raymond
>
2012/8/20 Andrew Faulds :
> On 20/08/12 00:16, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/20 Andrew Faulds :
>>>
>>> On 20/08/12 00:05, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
2012/8/20 Etienne Kneuss :
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki
> wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/18 Rasmus Lerdorf :
>>
Sorry for creating more "noise"...
Am 18.08.2012 06:59, schrieb Sherif Ramadan:
Further more, your assumption here that the result is incorrect (or
improperly indexed) is completely baseless and moot. You are making a
bold assumption that I both care about the keys and that I expect them
to be n
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Laruence wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Laruence wrote:
>>> Hi:
>>> This feature introduces list() support in foreach constructs(more
>>> info can be found here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/forea
21 matches
Mail list logo
