Am 15.06.2012 18:28, schrieb Christopher Jones:
On 06/15/2012 08:34 AM, Ulf Wendel wrote:
As long as client-side escaping is done properly, there is no
practical difference between the [client vs server -prepare]
approaches.
The big problem with this line of reasoning is that the client must
hi!
hi!
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Herman Radtke wrote:
> This userland library already solves all the issues you outlined with
> bcrypt: http://www.openwall.com/phpass/
>
> The API is very easy to use, has been around for a while and has a
> number of detailed articles that explain how to
Hi Internals,
I attempted to get (and failed) some attention on my request that I
posted to php-webmaster mailing list, so I'm escalating it here:
http://news.php.net/php.webmaster/13696
Thanks,
Paul Dragoonis.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:17:04 +0200, Paul Dragoonis
wrote:
I attempted to get (and failed) some attention on my request that I
posted to php-webmaster mailing list, so I'm escalating it here:
http://news.php.net/php.webmaster/13696
I agree that this request should not be granted. I don't s
Herman,
> This userland library already solves all the issues you outlined with
> bcrypt: http://www.openwall.com/phpass/
That library is not without its issues. For example, if you ask for a
portable hash, it gives you a custom algorithm instead of bcrypt.
That's because the library is php4 comp
hi Anthony,
Adding Alex to the loop as his insight will be unvaluable in this thread.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>> This userland library already solves all the issues you outlined with
>> bcrypt: http://www.openwall.com/phpass/
>
> That library is not without its i
Okay,
Thanks for the reply.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:17:04 +0200, Paul Dragoonis
> wrote:
>
>> I attempted to get (and failed) some attention on my request that I
>> posted to php-webmaster mailing list, so I'm escalating it here:
>>
>> http
On 16/06/12 15:39, Pierre Joye wrote:
> However the point here is not the implementation but the APIs.
>
> To be honest I am not a big fan of providing such an API in the core
> as no matter the default implementation, it will become obsolete soon
> or later. And changing the default brings its lot
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 14:34 +0200, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:17:04 +0200, Paul Dragoonis
> wrote:
>
> > I attempted to get (and failed) some attention on my request that I
> > posted to php-webmaster mailing list, so I'm escalating it here:
> >
> > http://news.php.net/php.we
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 14:34 +0200, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:17:04 +0200, Paul Dragoonis
>> wrote:
>> > I attempted to get (and failed) some attention on my request that I
>> > posted to php-webmaster mailing list,
Hi:
there comes some bug of a already fixed issue (PHP5.4.4)
the fix(#61998) is here
https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/90e23107a2acba1fd53b7e799372eb9f24194a56
but seems this fix is not merged into 5.4.4 when it was released?
so, what is the rule? :)
thanks
--
Laruence X
Hi!
> there comes some bug of a already fixed issue (PHP5.4.4)
>
> the fix(#61998) is here
> https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/90e23107a2acba1fd53b7e799372eb9f24194a56
>
> but seems this fix is not merged into 5.4.4 when it was released?
>
> so, what is the rule? :)
The f
12 matches
Mail list logo
