> Hi Larry,
>
> > 4) So given #2 and #3, the "readfile() will kill your memory, don't use
it"
> > line is a persistent urban legend that belongs on Snopes as debunked.
> > Looping on fread() for performance is a red herring.
>
> I implemented this earlier this very year to avoid memory issues (a
Hi internals:
danko reported this bug#61422: Lack of autoload on type hinting breaks
class_alias。
now parmeter type hint DID NOT trying to autoload. I think allow it autoloading
could be helpful.
BUGS&Commit for quick refer:
- https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61422
- https://bugs.php.net/bu
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:03 PM, reeze wrote:
> Hi internals:
> danko reported this bug#61422: Lack of autoload on type hinting breaks
> class_alias。
> now parmeter type hint DID NOT trying to autoload. I think allow it
> autoloading could be helpful.
>
> BUGS&Commit for quick refer:
> - https://b
Hi, Laruence:
I mean pass a wrong class object to a function/method. if the type
hinted Class didn't loaded, we
could try to load it. (if it's the right class, nothing happened), eg.
function func(NotFoundClass $a) {}
maybe we could pass another class instance.
$a = new DemoClass();
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:07 PM, reeze wrote:
> Hi, Laruence:
>
> I mean pass a wrong class object to a function/method. if the type hinted
> Class didn't loaded, we
> could try to load it. (if it's the right class, nothing happened), eg.
>
> function func(NotFoundClass $a) {}
>
> maybe
Hi Larry,
> Fascinating. I even verified the md5sum of the file I got on the other end
> just to be sure. I'll hold off on the blog post then. :-) I look forward
> to your test setup.
The server in question is still on PHP 5.2.13
Script:
http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:39:56 +0200, Paul Reinheimer
wrote:
Fascinating. I even verified the md5sum of the file I got on the other
end just to be sure. I'll hold off on the blog post then. :-) I look
forward to your test setup.
The server in question is still on PHP 5.2.13
[...]
I'll
I know it doesn't really fit this problem in general, but I figured I
would point it out. Lighttpd introduced a brilliant concept by
letting the server serve that file directly. Basically, instead of
using readfile, you would just send a header: X-SendFile: $filename...
It's available for Apache
On 05/01/2012 06:39 AM, Paul Reinheimer wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
>> Fascinating. I even verified the md5sum of the file I got on the other end
>> just to be sure. I'll hold off on the blog post then. :-) I look forward
>> to your test setup.
>
> The server in question is still on PHP 5.2.13
>
> S
On 05/01/2012 07:27 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 06:39 AM, Paul Reinheimer wrote:
>> Hi Larry,
>>
>>> Fascinating. I even verified the md5sum of the file I got on the other end
>>> just to be sure. I'll hold off on the blog post then. :-) I look forward
>>> to your test setup.
>>
>>
Hi All,
> Unfortunately, you've ignored Uwe's e-mail... The problem is not the PHP
> version; the problem is that you're buffering unlimited amounts of data.
> Check your configuration and make sure ob_get_level() returns 0.
My apologies in the delay, ob_get_level() returns 1, good catch.
phpinfo
Hi internals!
As per Pierres request I'm posting a new voting thread for my empty() RFC.
During discussions on IRC it turned out that most people would prefer
to allow expressions for empty(), but not for isset(), that's why the
vote now has three options:
* Both empty() and isset() should allow
> * None of them should accept expressions
>
>
just to be clear, this means keeping the current behavior as is.
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
On 5/1/12 10:01 AM, Paul Reinheimer wrote:
Hi All,
Unfortunately, you've ignored Uwe's e-mail... The problem is not the PHP
version; the problem is that you're buffering unlimited amounts of data.
Check your configuration and make sure ob_get_level() returns 0.
My apologies in the delay, ob_g
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Patrick ALLAERT
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2012/4/12 Nikita Popov :
> >> PS: I added isset() too, to address the consistency concerns mentioned
> on IRC.
> >
> > I would have voted +1 if it didn't contain the is
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 18:43, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> albeit I'm not laruence, but I also supported the idea to keep consistency
> across the allowed params of empty and isset.
> here is my reasoning:
> - both isset and empty are language constructs, which many people use
> almost interchang
2012/5/1 Ferenc Kovacs :
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Nikita Popov
> wrote:
> - both isset and empty are language constructs, which many people use
> almost interchangeability, changing one of them in a way that the same
> expression works with one of them, but blows up with a parse error se
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:45 AM, C.Koy wrote:
> As of 5.3.0 this bug does not exist for function names. Only classes and
> interfaces.
>
>
Turns out, if you cause a function to be called dynamically by (e.g.) using
a variable function, the bug will surface.
Could this be a clue for how to f
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
>
> [...] Instead, a second set of locale-independent, unicode-aware
> conversion functions (basically, iliaa's original solution, but Unicode
> compatible) to be used for identifiers would make name resolution
> independent of the curren
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> 2012/5/1 Ferenc Kovacs :
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Nikita Popov >wrote:
> > - both isset and empty are language constructs, which many people use
> > almost interchangeability, changing one of them in a way that the same
> > expr
Hi,
> It sounds like it. In that case the memory spike is happening in the output
> buffer, where the file is streamed into by readfile() in 8K chunks until the
> output buffer explodes. :-)
>
> So, I think we're back to "urban legend" territory.
That's good to know. Thanks, and my apologies fo
>
>
> So isset(UNDEFINEDCONSTANT) will be isset("UNDEFINEDCONSTANT") which
> will/should
> 1) yield a notice, which is unnexpected for isset
> 2) return true, which is also unexpected.
>
> I don't see much point in that.
>
>
yep, and if we allow expressions then it is the expected behavior, but you
Hi everyone,
On 05/01/2012 03:25 PM, Laruence wrote:
if you pass a right instance of class to a function , how can that
class not be loaded already?
for example:
function foo(Foo_Bar $a) {
}
how can you pass a Foo_Bar instance to function foo without
Foo_Bar class alre
Hi!
> Because Foo_Bar could be *defined* under a different name, say,
> Foo_Blah. Then, as soon as someone needed Foo_Bar, we would use
> class_alias to add an alias. That is, as soon as someone tried using
class_alias is a dirty hack. instanceof implies that the object is an
instance of speci
Sent from my iPhone
在 2012-5-2，3:52，Ferenc Kovacs 写道：
>>
>>
>> So isset(UNDEFINEDCONSTANT) will be isset("UNDEFINEDCONSTANT") which
>> will/should
>> 1) yield a notice, which is unnexpected for isset
>> 2) return true, which is also unexpected.
>>
>> I don't see much point in that.
>>
>>
> yep,
Hello,
I was wondering how to create a new object from a function call?
By this I mean if I call foo() from a script, that should return a new
instance of an object. If I call foo() again, it should be a new instance
of an object as well.
I haven't been able to find any good examples from the co
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Yader Hernandez
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering how to create a new object from a function call?
>
> By this I mean if I call foo() from a script, that should return a new
> instance of an object. If I call foo() again, it should be a new instance
> of an object
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Yader Hernandez
wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Yader Hernandez
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering how to create a new object from a function call?
>>
>> By this I mean if I call foo() from a script, that should return a new
>> instance of an object
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Yader Hernandez
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Yader Hernandez
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I was wondering how to create a new object from a function call?
>>>
>>> By this I mean if I call foo() fro
BTW: you should write to pecl-dev ML for such questions.
thanks
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Laruence wrote:
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Yader Hernandez
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Yader Hernandez
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
30 matches
Mail list logo
