Just to make everything clear, I'm not sure if it was my mistake change 5_4
branch, but currently 5_4 branch (after 322964 commit) solves the header
problem.
Thanks for the work.
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
>
>> Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
>
> I committed a
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
>
> > Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
>
> I committed a possible fix to trunk. It's pretty much along
> the patch from you, I just hat to fix crashes in the cli server
> and ne
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
> >
> > I committed a possible fix to trunk. It's pretty much along
> > the pa
Hi,
I was thinking that it could be a good idea (after current version migrates
to testing) to upload 5.4RCx to unstable to begin work on transition as soon
as possible. RC releases should have stable API(?), so application wise
there's no problem. I'll fill a release critical bug in our BTS, so
t
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:57:08 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
>>
>> > Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
>>
>> I committed a possible fix to trunk. It's pretty much along the patch
>
Hi Ondřej,
I'd wait for RC7 in any case, and with some luck it will be the final RC
for 5.4.0.
With my Debian hat on, I would wait for the official release, as to
minimize the noise we'll get in Debian from testing RCs. The recent RCs
all had some major issues fixed/changed in them (which is bett
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Ccing PHP internals to let them know and ask if it is a good idea (the 5.4RC
> will be probably used by more people when uploaded to Debian unstable, i.e.
> it means more testing, but also more bugreports).
Sounds like a good idea to me. This is why we hav
hi,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Hi Ondřej,
>
> I'd wait for RC7 in any case, and with some luck it will be the final RC
> for 5.4.0.
>
> With my Debian hat on, I would wait for the official release, as to
> minimize the noise we'll get in Debian from testing RCs. The re
On 02/01/2012 06:11 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking that it could be a good idea (after current version migrates
> to testing) to upload 5.4RCx to unstable to begin work on transition as soon
> as possible. RC releases should have stable API(?), so application wise
> there's no pro
Working with Pierre Joye on the build hosts (for Windows), automated testing
and test infrastructure for PHP/Windows.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory usage (enabling
higher concurrency) and runtime performance.
We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re: what
you're seeing with your real-world apps.
If you have any experiences to share please do.
hi Andi,
We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can
be seen here for example here:
http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20120119-5.3.9-5.4.0RC6.html
for a 5.3.9 vs 5.4.0RC6 comparison. There are other in the same location.
We are going to do a
Cache results are of course important. Memory usage would be great too.
Thanks!!
Andi
>-Original Message-
>From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:19 AM
>To: Andi Gutmans
>Cc: internals@lists.php.net
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
hi!
I could add zend optimizer to the stack but we do not have a license
(or is it free for the optimizer only?).
APC should join the party soon, not sure yet if it is ready yet. We
will run compat tests first.
About the memory usage, yes, this is on my todos. I have a tool for
that (on win) whi
Optimizer+ is free and packaged in Zend Server Community Edition. Happy to get
you and anyone else who wants to run benchmarks a copy out of cycle. We haven't
put a preview up yet but have it working.
Re: memory usage, I've seen some great results so definitely will be nice to
see what others a
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 18:08 +, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others
Can we also hear from you? :-)
johannes
who doesn't have proper benchmarks himself, but is interested in
seeing them ;-)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
> APC should join the party soon, not sure yet if it is ready yet. We
> will run compat tests first.
I ran into a crashing blocker with APC on 5.4:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60845
If anyone has the bandwidth to look into that, I'd love to help out in any way
I can.
(Sorry for the thread h
Absolutely. Will gather those and send them over...
Andi
>-Original Message-
>From: Johannes Schlüter [mailto:johan...@schlueters.de]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:49 AM
>To: Andi Gutmans
>Cc: internals@lists.php.net
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
>
>On Wed, 2012-02-0
Type Hinting was not in the original RFC, is type hinting stable enough to be
included with the Property Accessors functionality or is there no clear
agreement made with them yet?
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-as-implemented?&#read-only_and_write-only_properties
Could be:
19 matches
Mail list logo
