On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:09 +0100, Jan Dolecek wrote:
This issue seems much more complicated than I thought. We'll need to
consider all cases which could cause troubles and have a solution for
them.
Namely:
- rewriting permanent structures for internal classes, which are
being kept between r
hi,
Yes, there is a reason.
We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
by PHP. Some argues that it is safe. Btw, it is not faster to run on
x64 either.
php-next will have x64 support tho'.
Cheers,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Hello all,
Pierre Joye wrote:
Yes, there is a reason.
We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
by PHP. Some argues that it is safe. Btw, it is not faster to run on
x64 either.
Pierre ... please do not continue that statement without any evidence. ALL of
the benchmarks I've r
Hi,
as already mentioned in earlier update reports we are moving the web
repositories to git. I have some spare time to finally to it, so this
will happen today during the day. I will start with bugsqweb and then
move on and finish with the main repository and master beeing the last
ones to migra
Lester,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>> Yes, there is a reason.
>>
>> We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
>> by PHP. Some argues that it is safe. Btw, it is not faster to run on
>> x64 either.
>
>
> Pierre ... plea
Pierre Joye wrote:
Lester,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
Yes, there is a reason.
We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
by PHP. Some argues that it is safe. Btw, it is not faster to run on
x64 either.
Pierre ... ple
Perfect, thanks.
And to be fair, I don't care about performance. I would like 64 bit integers...
Anthony
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> Yes, there is a reason.
>
> We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
> by PHP. Some argues that it
Hey all,
I've found what I would call a bug (I submitted it as a feature
request, since that's probably more appropriate) with pow(). If any
one of the arguments is a float, it will cause the result to be a
float. On 32 bit systems this is fine, since all integers can be
exactly specified by the
On 1/18/2012 6:13 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> A much better reason for not supporting the build is probably that the 64bit
> compiler is
> not available in the free development stack? We have to buy a development
> stack to get the
> 64bit compiler which blocks rather than working with the publi
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/18/2012 6:13 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> A much better reason for not supporting the build is probably that the 64bit
compiler is
> not available in the free development stack? We have to buy a development
stack to get the
> 64bit compiler which blocks rather
On 1/18/2012 12:14 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 1/18/2012 6:13 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>>> >
>>> > A much better reason for not supporting the build is probably that the
>>> > 64bit
>>> compiler is
>>> > not available in the free development stack? We have to buy a
hi,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 6:13 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>>
>> A much better reason for not supporting the build is probably that the 64bit
>> compiler is
>> not available in the free development stack? We have to buy a development
>> stack to
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> The SDK and DDK remain free with a minimal toolchain, including 64 bit
> compilers. Of course they aren't called that anymore, because things
> are only fun in the Windows world when they overhaul the glossary of
> terms every 3 years
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>
> > The SDK and DDK remain free with a minimal toolchain, including 64 bit
> > compilers. Of course they aren't called that anymore, because things
> > are only fun in the Windows world when they overhaul the glossary of
> > terms
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Niel Archer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The SDK and DDK remain free with a minimal toolchain, including 64 bit
>> > compilers. Of course they aren't called that anymore, because things
>> > are only fun in the
On 18/01/12 20:35, Pierre Joye wrote:
Actually, no. There are any number of free mechanisms to build 64 bit code.
None of them are part of what we support tho' (we do not support mingw
for example, and won't support it).
Actually, why couldn't mingw be supported one day?
(supposing someone did
I have noticed that master.php.net has been offline for a few days now,
resulting in a failure to login at the PHP Wiki. Are you guys having this
same issue?
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 21:28, Klaus Silveira wrote:
> I have noticed that master.php.net has been offline for a few days now,
> resulting in a failure to login at the PHP Wiki. Are you guys having this
> same issue?
It had been going up and down, yes, and now it's completely down.
We're work
18 matches
Mail list logo
