Hi Gustavo,
First of all, thank you for catching this.
For now, I've tried to extend GC to support closures.
You can find the proposed patch at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60139
However it won't work for other classes, anyway.
Probably it would be better to extend object handlers in 5.4 wit
Hey,
yes, as said in a thread a week ago I agree. What about rolling RC1 this
Thursday?
Mind: As a result from 5.3.7 I will bug more projects to test it, be a
bit more demanding than in previous "primary testers" mails (like in
[1]), if anybody has some contacts for my "nag list" please tell me
hi,
Yes, this thursday will work.
I have contacted many projects as well and we are almost done with the
automated testing using their test suites. They may not all be ready
by Thursday but will next week max.
Cheers,
2011/10/31 Johannes Schlüter :
> Hey,
>
> yes, as said in a thread a week ago
I've also wrote another patch (gc-closure2.diff at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60139) that introduce new get_gc()
object handler in 5.4.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On 10/31/2011 12:51 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
First of all, thank you for catching this.
For now, I've tried to extend GC t
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:47, Nam Gi VU wrote:
> It is convenient to have a trailing comma when defining an array - so as
> easy to add/remove code to add/remove an entry to the array
>
> array(
> 'key00' => 'value00',
> 'key01' => 'value01',
> 'key02' => 'value02',
> ...
> )
>
> I su
