Index: tests/27_bug47199.phpt
===
--- tests/27_bug47199.phpt (revision 0)
+++ tests/27_bug47199.phpt (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+--TEST--
+Bug #47199 pg_delete fails on NULL
+--SKIPIF--
+
+--FILE--
+ NULL,
'not_null_field
Евгений,
thanks for the patch.I didn't fully review it but I wonder about a
thing:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 16:27 +0500, Соколов Евгений wrote:
> Index: tests/27_bug47199.phpt
> ===
> --- tests/27_bug47199.phpt(revision 0)
> +++ tes
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 08.02.2010 14:38, schrieb mathieu.suen:
I am wondering if there is some effort for having continuation in php.
Or is there already some construction for continuation?
There is http://phpcontinuation.sourceforge.net/ which I never got
around to actually tr
> did you really run this test and was it successful? - doesn't looklike
> for me.
I just run "php tests/27_bug47199.phpt" and check the result output.
Is this correct way?
>> Property changes on: tests/27_bug47199.phpt
> This isn't needed.
Okey, I just use previous test in this dir as example.
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 20:11 +0500, Sokolov Evgeniy wrote:
> > did you really run this test and was it successful? - doesn't looklike
> > for me.
> I just run "php tests/27_bug47199.phpt" and check the result output.
> Is this correct way?
The easy way to run it using the test Framework is by
If anyone ever needs me to host a patch, there's more than enough
room at patch.joeysmith.com, just email me the patch as an attachment
off-list. It'd probably be better than relying on a pastebin.
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 04:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at
Hi Skolov:
> I just run "php tests/27_bug47199.phpt" and check the result output.
> Is this correct way?
Use an EXPECT or EXPECTF section. See http://qa.php.net/phpt_details.php
for more information.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
Recently we've experienced an issue regarding the safe mode check in
tempnam() which was introduced in r288945 4 months ago. When calling
tempnam("/tmp/foo"), with /tmp/foo being a directory, it turned out that
the safe mode UID check was performed on /tmp instead of /tmp/foo. When
calling tempnam
