That is a test that is involved in the iconv's transilteration
feature, the behavior of which may vary by the platform you use. I
guess we don't actually need to test it then.
Moriyoshi
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Moriyoshi, or someone who knows CP932 and EUC-JP, co
Incorporating the changes and merges across the branches into one
commit under a sparse-layouted local copy doesn't do the book-keeping
against svn:mergeinfo. That's why I suppose it is not a good idea.
Moriyoshi
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2009, at 6:31 P
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 18:32, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 18:20, Sean Coates wrote:
>>> so what i'm wondering is: is there an easily parseable or structured
>>> interface (xmlrpc, soap, read-only JSON export, whatever) to the php.net
>>> bts
>>> that could be used to get
I set up a RFC page for this in wiki.php.net. Here it goes:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/altmbstring
Moriyoshi
2009/7/26 Moriyoshi Koizumi :
> Hi there,
>
> I almost finished an alternative implementation of mbstring that uses
> ICU instead of the exotic libmbfl in hope of replacing the current one
>
Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Incorporating the changes and merges across the branches into one
> commit under a sparse-layouted local copy doesn't do the book-keeping
> against svn:mergeinfo. That's why I suppose it is not a good idea.
I don't think a merge will work the way we use branches though.
*bump*
Dmitry, did you have a chance to review this patch yet?
- David
On 22.06.2009, at 15:21, David Zülke wrote:
Hi folks,
attached is a patch (with the respective test cases) that implements
DateTime marshalling from and to xsd:dateTime in ext/soap as
requested in http://bugs.php.net
On 28.07.2009, at 01:38, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:44:20 -0400, Gwynne Raskind > wrote:
README.SVN-RULES says
1. All changes should first go to trunk and then get merged from
trunk
(aka MFH'ed) to all other relevant branches.
which I've been following so far.
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it into 5.3 too, but RMs take the final decision.
The only thing I didn't understood - why win32/php_stdint.h is needed.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Dav
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at least
into
HEAD. I agree to commit it into 5.3 too, but RMs take the final
decision.
The only thing I didn't understood - w
David Zülke wrote:
> On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
>> In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at least into
>> HEAD. I agree to commit it into 5.3 too, but RMs take the final decision.
>>
>> Th
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Joe Orton wrote:
> Derick, do you make available the scripts used to generate timezonedb.h?
They're at http://cvs.xdebug.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/timelib/zones/
>
> Are you using the location co-ordinates from zone.tab in the "Olson"
> database?
Yes, but there was a tiny bug
Hi,
I'm wondering where the Zend/zend_float.h include file is used. I'm
interested in because I'm checking the behaviour variation between PHP4
and PHP5 (*), and floating point management seems to be fixed for all
platforms in an early version of PHP5 (revision r270301).
By the way, th
Gwynne Raskind wrote:
On Jul 27, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Just to be sure, is there any consensus on this? I thought I should
use svn merge.
README.SVN-RULES says
1. All changes should first go to trunk and then get merged from trunk
(aka MFH'ed) to all other relevant bran
Hi
2009/7/28 Lupus Michaelis :
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering where the Zend/zend_float.h include file is used. I'm
> interested in because I'm checking the behaviour variation between PHP4 and
> PHP5 (*), and floating point management seems to be fixed for all platforms
> in an early version of PHP5 (
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it into 5.3 too, but RMs take the final decision.
T
15 matches
Mail list logo
