Re: [PHP-DEV] towards the next 5.3 release

2009-02-08 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Johannes, Thursday, February 5, 2009, 8:02:47 PM, you wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 10:36 -0800, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >> Johannes Schlüter wrote: >> > - No typehint, as it is now, #47206 "Expected / to be documented", >> > incompatible with 5.2.6-5.2.8 but compatible with most other

Re: [PHP-DEV] towards the next 5.3 release

2009-02-08 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Stanislav, it should actually be a hard error. As we always claim PHP follows pure IS-A relation ships. Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 8:42:51 PM, you wrote: > Hi! >> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46984 - E_STRICT > I think overriding foo($x) with foo($x, $y) - with both parameters > req

Re: [PHP-DEV] towards the next 5.3 release

2009-02-08 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
On 08.02.2009, at 15:36, Marcus Boerger wrote: it should actually be a hard error. As we always claim PHP follows pure IS-A relation ships. Not sure we claimed PHP did anything pure ever. Or when we "claim" anything to begin with. Maybe we also claim that we are a glue language optimi

Re: [PHP-DEV] towards the next 5.3 release

2009-02-08 Thread Sean Coates
Maybe we can first collect a list here on internals@ on what apps have been successfully been run on 5.3 and whether they required any tweaking. If after we make a list there's still need to reach out I'd be happy to do some of that. FWIW, I've some casual testing with Habari and 5.3 and we h