Hi all
We should probably discuss some ideas for Google Summer of Code this year.
I see people have already added few to the wiki page[1] which is great
and all but wikis aren't for discussions..
The plan as I see it:
Discuss ideas. Draft them up on the wiki. Move them to php.net/ideas
when they
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Hannes Magnusson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We should probably discuss some ideas for Google Summer of Code this year.
> I see people have already added few to the wiki page[1] which is great
> and all but wikis aren't for discussions..
>
> The plan
Hello Dmitry,
please don't apply. The patch looks rather rough and untested (see below).
Also I really disagree to making the engine even more complex and adding
even more different behavior ways. That way we just introduce more errors
as we cannot test the engine in all its modes. We simply do no
I do think the wiki page needs some forwarding / segmenting.. etc.
Who can/should contribute to it, (how it may not reflect the views of
the php group..)
Who 'owns' it in the end, and is going to delete proposals they think
are a bit off-topic etc...
Ideas from any .php net member relating to
Hi there,
I have a suggestion regarding get_headers, however I do not have a
knowledge of C with which to provide a patch.
The function get_headers is, as most will know, used to retrieve headers
generated by an HTTP request. The primary parameter to this, "string
$url", is provided unencode
Justin Martin wrote:
Hi there,
I have a suggestion regarding get_headers, however I do not have a
knowledge of C with which to provide a patch.
The function get_headers is, as most will know, used to retrieve headers
generated by an HTTP request. The primary parameter to this, "string
$url"
HI Alan!
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Alan Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do think the wiki page needs some forwarding / segmenting.. etc.
> Who can/should contribute to it, (how it may not reflect the views of
> the php group..)
> Who 'owns' it in the end, and is going to delete pr
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> please don't apply. The patch looks rather rough and untested (see below).
> Also I really disagree to making the engine even more complex and adding
> even more different behavior ways. That way we ju
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> recently there were quite a few proposals about stuff for 5.3. If we
> implement
> them all we won't finish in a "soonish" time and we get new ideas
> postponing
> the 5.3 release therefore the following:
