"Sara Golemon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The primary reason I went this route rather than handling it in the parser
> (I did consider it), was so that a clearer error message could be given
> than "Unexpected T_STRING". If you'd rather, I'd be happy to move this
> fix over
zend_list and zene_llist have what defferentiation?
Thanks~~!
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
What is the zend_interfaces.h main function ?
langwanluo
2007-03-06
Hi all,
can anybody help me to find out contact information from
Danny Heijl, Christian Cartus, Corne' Cornelius
Thanks a lot for your help
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
i.A. Frank Klein
Hi Frank
Christian Cartus: nyenyon@
Corne' Cornelius: nobbie@
Danny Heijl: danny@
All @php.net of course.
-Hannes
On 3/6/07, Frank Klein1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
can anybody help me to find out contact information from
Danny Heijl, Christian Cartus, Corne' Cornelius
Thanks a lo
Hi,
I've started this discussion, but did not participate (cause I was ill).
I like the glob:// implementation, it solves my problems as developer.
Another problem with implementing glob like behavior in each stream
implementation is that it breaks compatibility, potentially even causing
secu
Hi,
I've started this discussion, but did not participate (cause I was ill).
I like the glob:// implementation, it solves my problems as developer.
Another problem with implementing glob like behavior in each stream
implementation is that it breaks compatibility, potentially even causing
secu
Hi Arnold,
On 3/6/07, Arnold Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've started this discussion, but did not participate (cause I was ill).
I like the glob:// implementation, it solves my problems as developer
The problem is not how glob is implemented (nothing changed here) but
the glo
Hi Andrei,
On 3/5/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pierre,
How's it going with this list you posted? Last I heard you had some
issues with ext/session. Can you elaborate please?
The issue is not specifically with the ext/session but with extensions
accessing the input data duri
Hello,
Konsta asked me to forward this email, as he is having issues posting to
internals. Anyways I should also add that I would be willing to mentor
this proposal.
Obviously Doctrine is not part of an official (sub)project of php.net.
He did try to get the package into PEAR, though there w
Hi Greg,
There is no reason why you can't still use the current method to implement
your variations to the singleton design pattern. But, yes, I am proposing
that the strict "text book" variety is implemented.
If you haven't had the need to singleton-ize more than 2-3 classes, you
probably haven'
Thanks Peter.
I agree with everything except the use of the keyword "new". I think that
it's just simply too confusing. People won't know whether they are getting
a fresh instance or not.
The "only" keyword suggestion is not bad. I think id prefer "get" or
something. (or better no keyword at al
Hi,
It may have already been proposed, but I give it a shot:
I believe it would be nice to be able to dynamically reference static
members and constants.
Currently, there is no way to do that and the only way would be to
create a static method and use call_user_func(array($classname, 'getThat
Hello Etienne,
besides a tiny bit of whitespace issues the patch looks fine. Actually we
use tabs at the beginning of lines here (prior and after |'s). Once you got
more people looking/commenting on the patch we mde decide whetehr to apply
it.
best regards
marcus
Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 4:06:5
Hi,
Don't forget, please review http://pear.php.net/~greg/halt for inclusion
to fix the implementation of __HALT_COMPILER().
Greg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks Peter.
>
> I agree with everything except the use of the keyword "new". I think that
> it's just simply too confusing. People won't know whether they are getting
> a fresh instance or not.
>
> The "only" keyword suggestion is not bad. I think id prefer "g
Just curious, why did you choose to mutex around a hash instead of
using the zend_ts_hash functions?
Changing the access semantics while preserving the type and name of
that variable will cause any external modules that are unaware of that
change to subtly break, or if you're lucky, crash hard.
My really really late 2 cents on this.
Please make sure that your changes don't make the extension depend on
OpenLDAP. Solaris and Windows LDAP implementations are close but not
totally the same as OpenLDAP.
I haven't looked at your patches and probably won't have time to do
so; I'm merely doin
Patch looks good.
Check with Ilia about scheduling it for 5.x
--Wez.
On 3/1/07, Benjamin Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Wez,
this patch that adds a msg_queue_exists() to ext/sysvmsg. Currently
there is no way to tell wether msg_get_queue() will create or just a
attach to a queue.
It woul
Wez Furlong wrote:
> My really really late 2 cents on this.
>
> Please make sure that your changes don't make the extension depend on
> OpenLDAP. Solaris and Windows LDAP implementations are close but not
> totally the same as OpenLDAP.
>
> I haven't looked at your patches and probably won't hav
Hello Wez,
Thanks for your feedback.
Indeed the mutex that i placed isn't useful and in fact this is a test patch
i made.
I didn't know TsHashTable :)
This says the mutex will not solve the problem to which i face.
The dl() function can't work with ZTS.
I coded other test source here :
http://
21 matches
Mail list logo
