Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/libxml/tests/002.phpt?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&diff_format=u
Index: php-src/ext/libxml/tests/002.phpt
diff -u php-src/ext/libxml/tests/002.phpt:1.2
php-src/ext/libxml/tests/002.ph
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:34:05 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Wallner) wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> >
> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/libxml/tests/002.phpt?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&diff_format=u
> Index: php-src/ext/libxml/tests/002.php
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Pierre wrote:
> On 9/16/06, Christian Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pierre wrote:
> > > Proposal:
> > > **
> > >
> > > I. Availalbe functions:
> > >---
> > >
> > > * input_get
> > > Gets variable from outside PHP or from a userland variab
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Pierre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent discussion about the filter API in the pecl-dev list
> (http://news.php.net/php.pecl.dev/4123), I summarize again what I
> proposed a while back. It is very important to agree on an API now or
> we will have to remove filter from 5.
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Dan Scott wrote:
> On 16/09/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 16-Sep-06, at 11:35 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
> >
> > > Minor: the general structure of the function names are
> > > __, so it would be more consistent if this was
> > > 'input_list_filters'.
> >
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Pierre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 9/17/06, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yep I agree. I thought the idea was to go to filter_* which has been our
> > standard for extensions.
> > I'm sure we can find good names for the functions in this way.
>
> old name > new name
Hello,
On 9/19/06, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > unless FILTER_FLAG_ARRAY is given in which case it should behave like
> > before. This would make it easier to use the filtered values IMHO.
>
> It always returns an array when FILTER_FLAG_ARRAY is given. Even when
> the input va
Hello,
On 9/19/06, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Pierre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent discussion about the filter API in the pecl-dev list
> (http://news.php.net/php.pecl.dev/4123), I summarize again what I
> proposed a while back. It is very important to
Pierre wrote:
The flag allows arrays and always returns an array. It is obvious as
if you allow array or scalar, you have to use is_array, that's a step
we easily drop internally by always returning an array. I do not see
the point to have ALLOW_ARRAY and FORCE_ARRAY. It is confusing.
I agree w
Hello,
On 9/20/06, Christian Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pierre wrote:
> The flag allows arrays and always returns an array. It is obvious as
> if you allow array or scalar, you have to use is_array, that's a step
> we easily drop internally by always returning an array. I do not see
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
