On 7.3.2006 15:44 Uhr, Steph Fox wrote:
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
Sorry for the noise. I was told to vote.
Meaning, I don't care, never had a use for GOTO, but if the caring
majority thinks, it's needed, why not :)
chregu
sa
5.1.3 snap news file contains the following fragment:
- Improved SPL: (Marcus)
- Fixed issues with not/double calling of constructors of SPL iterators.
- Fixed issues with info-class/file-class in SPL directory handling
classes.
- Fixed ArrayIterator::seek().
- Added SimpleXMLElement::coun
Xuefer wrote:
is there any chance that a buffer in output buffer will be supported?
Nope, as this can cause all sorts of evil things.
Regards,
--
Michael - http://dev.iworks.at/ext-http/http-functions.html.gz
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Michael Wallner wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
1) goto and break label
+0
3) break label only (like Java)
+1
You do realize that this is:
label:
while(condition) {
break label;
}
As a C programmer this confuses me to no end. When I see "label:" I
expect c
On 07 March 2006 09:28, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Please reviw and vote.
>
> 1) goto and break label
> 2) goto only (like C)
> 3) break label only (like Java)
> 4) nothing
1) +0.25
2) -1e38
3) +1e38
4) -infinity
Or, in other words, I want labelled break, and I don't want to have to emulate
it wit
since i'm using php and it's documentation for years, i wanted to contribute my
part to the php project.
i'm interested in translating (english, german, polish) and maintaining the
documentation, because it still has a lot of bugs or outdated informations...
got this site suggested from tobsn -
include('php://filter/string.toupper/resource=/foo/bar/baz');
Filters can be stacked, set on the read or write chains individually (though
the latter hardly matters for include/require), and resource can be another
wrapper, not just a local file.
Ref: http://www.php.net/wrappers.php
-Sara
-
Sara Golemon schrieb:
> include('php://filter/string.toupper/resource=/foo/bar/baz');
I do not want to change the include/require calls but instead set up
a filter for the standard ones.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2
Oops, missent this the first time using my personal address... Sebastian:
Please don't reply-all to that one, I'm trying to keep that off the list.
> I do not want to change the include/require calls but instead set up
> a filter for the standard ones.
>
Ah... I can see use for that.
I'm actually
Sara Golemon schrieb:
> Ah... I can see use for that.
I expected nothing else from you ;-)
> I'll come back to this and look at adding something along the lines
> of: stream_filter_auto() or whatever.
Great, and thanks in advance,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://
What is it that php5.1.2 reads /etc/group on startup to setgroup?
My Solaris 10 boxes use LDAP as a NIS replacement so that we don't have to
manage individual group files on all the servers.
When I start Apache without php I see this the dtrace dtruss script:
log.dtruss-httpdcmd-nophp: 26471/1:
kjc wrote:
What is it that php5.1.2 reads /etc/group on startup to setgroup?
My Solaris 10 boxes use LDAP as a NIS replacement so that we don't have to
manage individual group files on all the servers.
When I start Apache without php I see this the dtrace dtruss script:
log.dtruss-httpdcmd-noph
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 17:37 +0300, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> 1) I would very like to see some real example where "static" is necessary?
>
> 2) "static" is really bad name. I suggest "caller", Marcus thought about
> "class".
>
> 3) I COMPLETELY DISAGREE TO ADD RUNTIME DATA INTO
> zend_function/zend_o
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
Because of some confused people I reverted "break label" patch and post it
for discussion once again together with GOTO patch.
Please reviw and vote.
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.5
I'm not concerned by the vote.
Please, Bertrand, the goto/labelled breaks discussions were held ad
infinitum last June, and back in December, and again more recently. The
_only_ concern now is the vote. Anything else will lead to so much noise on
here we can't hear ourselves think, and since
Steph Fox wrote:
I'm not concerned by the vote.
Please, Bertrand, the goto/labelled breaks discussions were held ad
infinitum last June, and back in December, and again more recently. The
_only_ concern now is the vote. Anything else will lead to so much noise
on here we can't hear ourselve
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
Because of some confused people I reverted "break label" patch and post it
for discussion once again together with GOTO patch.
Please reviw and vote.
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.
Thanks for responding...
I see the following GID calls from libc, supplying both w/php and w/o php.
Hmm. what next?
logfile: CALLCOUNT
log.dappprof-apachectl:libc.so.1
getgid 1
log.dappprof-apachectl:libc.so.1
getpgid
That's 'one man one vote' NOT 'one mail one vote' :)
- Original Message -
From: "bertrand Gugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; "Steph Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dmitry Stogov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL
This patch is a bit rough. I'll try and think if there's a more elegant way.
Andi
At 01:06 PM 3/8/2006, Mike Lively wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 17:37 +0300, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> 1) I would very like to see some real example where "static" is necessary?
>
> 2) "static" is really bad name. I s
I'd still say we make it "this". It's reasonable and consistent.
- David
Am 09.03.2006 um 01:13 schrieb Andi Gutmans:
This patch is a bit rough. I'll try and think if there's a more
elegant way.
Andi
At 01:06 PM 3/8/2006, Mike Lively wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 17:37 +0300, Dmitry Stog
Yeah I agree but I'm less concerned about the
naming at this point but how to implement it assuming we find a name.
Andi
At 04:18 PM 3/8/2006, David Zülke wrote:
I'd still say we make it "this". It's reasonable and consistent.
- David
Am 09.03.2006 um 01:13 schrieb Andi Gutmans:
This patc
> If the "Java-like" syntax is seen as confusing, what about, as in some other
> languages, interpolating the label into the for/foreach/while statement:
>
> for () label {...} or for label (...) {...}
a. label: for () { break label; } AND label: { for () {
break label; } } (see
Please, Xuefer! Your vote was already recorded, shhh!
- Original Message -
From: "Xuefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ford, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dmitry Stogov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL
If the "J
24 matches
Mail list logo
