At 03:17 23/06/2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Zeev,
thanks for clarifying. Any chance we could change that for
"normal/unproblemeatic" exit()s in the future with run-tests
in mind?
The trick would be how we can detect a non problematic exit(). For example,
function foo() { exit(); }
fun
Seems to be a good idea, but not for PHP 4 (closed for new features).
Official description:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/httponly_cookies.asp
Nuno
- Original Message -
Hello Marcus,
patches for official php-4.3.11 release in attachment... (diff -Naur)
Jochen
[p
Provide the patch against CVS HEAD branch.
(either get the sources via CVS or as snapshot from http://snaps.php.net)
--Jani
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Jochen Hansper wrote:
Hello Marcus,
patches for official php-4.3.11 release in attachment... (diff -Naur)
Jochen
[php_session.h.patc
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 03:17 23/06/2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >Hello Zeev,
> >
> > thanks for clarifying. Any chance we could change that for
> >"normal/unproblemeatic" exit()s in the future with run-tests
> >in mind?
>
> The trick would be how we can detect a non proble
Hey,
I'm not sure who maintains the bugs database these days. It'd make it
easier for me to follow the bugs if we'd merge the scripting engine and
Zend Engine 2 categories into one. We will know according to the PHP
version what version of the Zend Engine it is. Comments?
Who can take care o
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm not sure who maintains the bugs database these days. It'd make it easier
> for me to follow the bugs if we'd merge the scripting engine and Zend Engine 2
> categories into one. We will know according to the PHP version what version of
> the
At 04:37 PM 6/23/2005 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm not sure who maintains the bugs database these days. It'd make it
easier
> for me to follow the bugs if we'd merge the scripting engine and Zend
Engine 2
> categories into one. We will kn
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> >I can do that if we agree on doing it. You do know that most of the ones
> >in the "scripting engine" one are ZE1 bugs?
>
> It seems the majority were also verified with PHP 5, no?
I'm not sure, but would it help to move the ZE2 bugs to the "Scripting
I agree with Derick, it makes much more sense to merge ZE2 bugs into
scripting engine bugs category.
Ilia
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Yeah that's fine and then nuke the Zend Engine 2 category.
At 04:50 PM 6/23/2005 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> >I can do that if we agree on doing it. You do know that most of the ones
> >in the "scripting engine" one are ZE1 bugs?
>
> It seems the majo
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I can do that if we agree on doing it. You do know that most of the ones
in the "scripting engine" one are ZE1 bugs?
It seems the majority were also verified with PHP 5, no?
I'm not sure, but would it help
Hello,
>Jani: Provide the patch against CVS HEAD branch.
You can find the patches for httpOnly session cookies against the PHP5
CVS HEAD in the attachment.
Now also included is support for httpOnly cookies for PHP functions
setcookie() and setrawcookie().
bool setcookie ( string name [, string
12 matches
Mail list logo
