Greg Beaver wrote:
Hi,
I agree that allowing $a->bar() with a static method is too confusing,
and should not be allowed. However, the ability to call a static method
of an object (variable class name, in other words), is invaluable. What
if PHP simply allowed $object::staticMethod() syntax?
W
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Greg Beaver wrote:
Hi,
I agree that allowing $a->bar() with a static method is too confusing,
and should not be allowed. However, the ability to call a static
method of an object (variable class name, in other words), is
invaluable. What if PHP simply allowed $objec
== Quote from Greg Beaver ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'s article
> class foo {
> static function bar()
> {
> echo 'hello';
> }
> }
>
> $bar = 'hello';
> $a = new foo;
> $a->bar(); // this could be disabled to error out easily
> $a::bar(); // my patch now allows this to print "hello"
>
The best thing to do to get it in is to write a patch :-)
Although the ldap extension is listed as being maintained, I don't
think Stig Venaas has had much time for it in a while.
The next best thing to writing a patch is showing some C code that
shows how to do it--maybe someone will take it on.
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 18:40, Hans Lellelid wrote:
> Hi -
[...]
> foreach($entities as $ent) {
> $peer = $ent->getPeer(); // e.g. might be BookPeer
> $peer->doSelect(new Criteria()); //static: BookPeer::doSelect()
> }
$m= new Reflection_Method($ent->getPeer(), 'doSelect');
$m->invoke(NU
Adding of Structures::Structures_Graph to PEAR CVS. PEPr closed proposal page is
here: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=20
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
Regarding the question about how to know if a method is declared static
or not, I add the fn_flags to the result (flags property) of
getMethod();. I tested it with PHP userland classes but not internal
objects. This new property reflects the internal fn_flags in
zend_function struct. The co
Hello Hartmut,
Thursday, February 19, 2004, 10:03:33 AM, you wrote:
> Greg Beaver wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I agree that allowing $a->bar() with a static method is too confusing,
>> and should not be allowed. However, the ability to call a static method
>> of an object (variable class name, in othe
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:49:42 +0100
Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A static and a non static member function are two absolute completley
> different things. Anyway calling a static method from an instance as
> $instance->staticmethod() or $instance::staticmethod() should be
> allowed.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:49:42 +0100
> Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A static and a non static member function are two absolute completley
> > different things. Anyway calling a static method from an instance as
> > $instance->staticm
Marcus Boerger wrote:
A static and a non static member function are two absolute completley
different things.
sure they are (in certain ways), but when *calling* them (from a class
users point of view, not an implementors point of view) the only
difference is that the static member is guaranteed t
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
One sure thing, $this should not be set in static methods.
ACK
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:02:10 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it should get set in non-static methods...which doesn't happen now
> :)
$this is set in non static methods if the method is called from an
instance of the object and not set if called statically. It's exactly
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
One sure thing, $this should not be set in static methods.
I completely agree - the headache of fixing PEAR's "kind of static"
methods is really annoying, and not really fixable. A method should
either be static, non-static, or split into two methods, one that is
st
Timm Friebe wrote:
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 18:40, Hans Lellelid wrote:
foreach($entities as $ent) {
$peer = $ent->getPeer(); // e.g. might be BookPeer
$peer->doSelect(new Criteria()); //static: BookPeer::doSelect()
}
$m= new Reflection_Method($ent->getPeer(), 'doSelect');
$m->invok
Hello Pierre-Alain,
Thursday, February 19, 2004, 4:10:09 PM, you wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:02:10 +0100 (CET)
> Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But it should get set in non-static methods...which doesn't happen now
>> :)
> $this is set in non static methods if the method is ca
Hello Hans,
Thursday, February 19, 2004, 4:14:53 PM, you wrote:
> Timm Friebe wrote:
>> On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 18:40, Hans Lellelid wrote:
>>
>>>foreach($entities as $ent) {
>>> $peer = $ent->getPeer(); // e.g. might be BookPeer
>>> $peer->doSelect(new Criteria()); //static: BookPeer::do
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:21:50 +0100
Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But why the hell do you want a message, calling a static method from
> anywhere is absolutley fine. This of course includes calling a static
> method of an instance's class, however that is syntactically
> accomplished.
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
And PEAR does not lead PHP devs but the counter, imho.
it_sure_doesnt (althoughItWouldLikeTo) ;)
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Pierre-Alain,
Thursday, February 19, 2004, 3:51:41 PM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> Regarding the question about how to know if a method is declared static
> or not, I add the fn_flags to the result (flags property) of
> getMethod();. I tested it with PHP userland classes but not internal
> objec
Hello Pierre-Alain,
Thursday, February 19, 2004, 4:28:50 PM, you wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:21:50 +0100
> Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But why the hell do you want a message, calling a static method from
>> anywhere is absolutley fine. This of course includes calling a stati
I'm trying to compile the lastest snap shot 'php5-200402191630' with Red
Hat Linux release 7.3 and am getting the following error:
/usr/local/src/php5-200402191630/ext/oci8/oci8.c: In function
`_oci_desc_flush_hash_dtor':
/usr/local/src/php5-200402191630/ext/oci8/oci8.c:841: parse error before
`*
Tobias Bradtke wrote:
Is the fix applied in the current available snapshot (Win 32 package)
from Feb 16, 2004 15:30 GMT?
that snapshot did not work for me, but
http://snaps.php.net/win32/php5-win32-200402181130.zip does fine.
and there is also another new snapshot on http://snaps.php.net/
webwurs
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, TheSin wrote:
> >> why is it doing this? something in the php imap build? or is it in the
> >> uw-imap-c-client build? config option? Maybe all the above?
> >
> > It's your c-client build most likely. Hard to say since
> > I don't know what version you have and how y
Hi:
As you probably know, run-tests.php runs recursively through each
subdirectory encountered. I've run into circumstances where it is helpful
to have it just run files in the present directory, without recursion. I
have created a patch which watches for an "-l" flag. The -l flag is
similar
I'm trying to build a Win32 PHP5 without XML support (to determine how
much of my 3+ megabyte php5ts.dll can be attributed to it). Using the
latest snapshot (php5-200402191230) and this configure line:
cscript //nologo configure.js
--with-extra-includes=..\openssl-0.9.7c\include;..\iconv-1.9.1\in
We currently depend on the iconv symbols being found in our libxml.
That error can probably be solved by disabling the iconv extension though.
It is safe to ignore errors when nmaking clean.
--Wez.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Sisolak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wez,
Running with --without-iconv along with all the --without-
does make the link work.
When I run "nmake clean" is does remove the files in the root of the
Release_TS directory, but it doesn't remove files from any of the
extension specific directories, the SAPI directories, TSRM, or Zend
(i.e.
28 matches
Mail list logo
