At 08:01 PM 11/5/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that echo $object statements in PHP 5 display object ids that
are kept by the engine, so this data is already in the string form and it
is data that exists. As for as a use for this feature, one can't easily
say there is not a use;
At 02:07 AM 11/6/2003 +0100, Christian Schneider wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
George (thinking [] is pretty but disliking alternative syntaxes)
Ok, let me recap my short visit on this mailing list:
1) Dangling commas in function calls were considered bloat
No, not bloat. I was worried that the
Hey,
Is there any place the updated SimpleXML, DOM, XSL extensions are
documented? I don't think they are in the PHP manual. This is crucial to
get the word out because I've gotten quite a few queries from people who
don't know about the new XML features.
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime
This one time, at band camp, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Is there any place the updated SimpleXML, DOM, XSL extensions are
> documented? I don't think they are in the PHP manual. This is crucial to
> get the word out because I've gotten quite a few queries from people who
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 17:48, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 11:48 AM 11/5/2003 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> >On November 5, 2003 11:21 am, you wrote:
> > > Well, like I said before, I am not sure this is a clear case of that. I'm
> > > probably the biggest defender around of the no-magic rule, but [
Perlish or not could not be a real reason for adding or not adding a feature
in PHP. The important thing here is if it fits to the language concept or
not.
Kouber
"Sara Golemon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FWIW- (And I understand I'm late chiming in on this threa
My slides from my talk about XML in PHP5 are here:
http://slides.bitflux.ch/phpconf2003/
examples are here
http://slides.bitflux.ch/phpconf2003/examples/
And Sebastian's slides (in german) are here:
http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/blog/
maybe that helps for a start in really documentating it
Kouber Saparev wrote:
> Perlish or not could not be a real reason for adding or not
> adding a feature in PHP. The important thing here is if it
> fits to the language concept or not.
Indeed, and IMHO it does, much like
($a==$b)?...
fits in quite well as an alternative to
if ($a==$b)...
It i
At 09:58 AM 11/6/2003 +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
Let's sum up the pros and cons:
Pros: sexiness?
Cons: another BC issue, syntax obfuscation, potential grammar conflicts
Just to be more accurate there are no BC issues and as far as I know, there
aren't any grammar conflicts.
Andi
--
PHP Inter
Mike Robinson wrote:
Perlish or not could not be a real reason for adding or not
adding a feature in PHP. The important thing here is if it
fits to the language concept or not.
Indeed, and IMHO it does, much like
($a==$b)?...
fits in quite well as an alternative to
if ($a==$b)...
It is an a
On 05 November 2003 17:19, Marco Tabini wrote:
> Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
> > On 05 November 2003 17:06, Marco Tabini contributed these pearls of
> > wisdom:
> >
> >
> > > Christian Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > > Marco Tabini wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > $a = [[1,2,3],[1=>[1,3,2,2], "a"=>
On 05 November 2003 18:39, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2003, Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
> >
> > I don't think the number of characters is the main issue here --
> > it's about having a *nicer* set of characters. Personally, I'd be
> > still be in favour (although not quite
Please move this thread to private email.
- Sascha
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Sascha,
I don't think it's a private matter. Feel free to delete the emails with
this subject when they come in.
Andi
At 01:30 PM 11/6/2003 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Please move this thread to private email.
- Sascha
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsub
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Sascha,
>
> I don't think it's a private matter.
If there was anything constructive in that long thread of "I
like it" -- "no, I don't!" I might agree with you, but given
the current contents, the noise exceeds the useful debate by
far.
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 13:04, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 09:58 AM 11/6/2003 +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
> >Let's sum up the pros and cons:
> >
> >Pros: sexiness?
> >
> >Cons: another BC issue, syntax obfuscation, potential grammar conflicts
>
> Just to be more accurate there are no BC issues and as
Hi !
Richard,
I understand very well the benefit of using only one function to do the
same work, but they are already 2 function that does the same for private
keys and for consistency i think i had to submit 2 function to do the same
job for public keys.
Of course the best way is to have only
Eric,
Appologies, I should have been more careful to check I actually knew what I
was talking about before I opened my mouth ;-) Didn't realise the existing
private key version came in two separate functions like this. As I said, I'm
a big fan of consistency, but I guess we have two precedents her
to maintain a good documentation about PHP
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I've also done a touch of slides on it, as has Sterling, and maybe even
someone else, at talks.php.net. Nothing terribly in-depth.
Shane
Christian Stocker wrote:
My slides from my talk about XML in PHP5 are here:
http://slides.bitflux.ch/phpconf2003/
examples are here
http://slides.bitflux.c
As one of PHP 5's main improvements is XML how about making a small section
on php.net dedicated to it?
I mean the manual is of course a must but I think it'd be nice to give it
some more exposure.
Maybe a first step would to be slides and stuff you guys wrote up there?
Andi
At 10:06 AM 11/6/20
I wonder if there is some way to transform the w3c dom documentation.
That would be a quick-n-dirty way to get the documentation for the dom
extension into php.net docs. Then it could be updated to be more
php-ish, and examples could be pulled from the various talk slides.
Shane
Andi Gutmans w
Hello,
Can anybody tell me why multiple resultsets are not (yet) supported by
the mysqli extension in the php 5.0.0 source? Is it just a matter of
time before the mysql_more_results and mysql_next_result are available
or is there a more serious problem?
Arjen de Rijke
--
PHP Internals - PHP R
On 11/6/03 7:59 PM, Shane Caraveo wrote:
I wonder if there is some way to transform the w3c dom documentation.
That would be a quick-n-dirty way to get the documentation for the dom
extension into php.net docs. Then it could be updated to be more
php-ish, and examples could be pulled from the
Maybe something like that could help you:
#define HAS_INT64_PRIMITIVE
#ifdef MSVC
#define int64_t __int64
#elif ...
#else
typedef struct int64_t_ { int32_t a, b; } int64_t;
#undef HAS_INT64_PRIMITIVE
#endif
- Michael
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: h
Arjen de Rijke wrote:
Hello,
Can anybody tell me why multiple resultsets are not (yet) supported by
the mysqli extension in the php 5.0.0 source? Is it just a matter of
time before the mysql_more_results and mysql_next_result are available
or is there a more serious problem?
Arjen de Rijke
H
Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Shouldn't you MFH this now?
> (not sure if it was done already :)
> If you do MFH, don't forget to move the BFN from HEAD NEWS
> to PHP_4_3 NEWS..
Well, I tried doing so, but I didn't because the patch would be too huge
for a simple f
Alright.
On 6 Nov 2003, at 2:58 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:01 PM 11/5/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that echo $object statements in PHP 5 display object ids
that are kept by the engine, so this data is already in the string
form and it is data that exists. As for as a use fo
28 matches
Mail list logo
