I like it a lot as well. Having the [] syntax also support range()-like
calls would be a very nice idea as well. :D
Regards,
Manuzhai
"Mike Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> s0niX wrote:
>
> > The problem i see when using array() (or list()) is that it nearl
s0niX wrote:
> The problem i see when using array() (or list()) is that it nearly looks
> like it is a function, but it isn't. Using [] instead would clearly
> mark this difference.
> array() and list() are special language constructs, why shouldn't
> they look a bit special?
> This doesn't break
Hi
The problem i see when using array() (or list()) is that it nearly looks
like it is a function, but it isn't. Using [] instead would clearly
mark this difference.
array() and list() are special language constructs, why shouldn't they look a bit
special?
This doesn't break backwards compatibili
