Re: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] Integrating SPL

2003-06-27 Thread Sterling Hughes
> We should decide and implement whatever is decided on by beta2. > great. > > > So how do we get a formal spec for the changes (starting with nicer names, > > > i.e. Iterator instead of spl_foreach)? :) It's probably best if you take > > > Sterling's email and try and come to a final set of int

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] Integrating SPL

2003-06-27 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:19 AM 27/6/2003 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote: > The big hurry about beta 1 is that it has been lingering for too long and I > think the only way to push PHP 5 is to finally get a beta out there. We can > keep on compromising indefinitely because there'll always be that one last > fix someon

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] Integrating SPL

2003-06-27 Thread Sterling Hughes
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 09:22, Andi Gutmans wrote: > At 10:09 AM 27/6/2003 +0200, Marcus Börger wrote: > >Hello Andi, > > > >Friday, June 27, 2003, 9:53:50 AM, you wrote: > > > >AG> Hey, > > > >AG> In general I think the ideas behind SPL are interesting. However, my main > >AG> problem with the whole

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] Integrating SPL

2003-06-27 Thread Sterling Hughes
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 04:09, Marcus Börger wrote: > Hello Andi, > > Friday, June 27, 2003, 9:53:50 AM, you wrote: > > AG> Hey, > > AG> In general I think the ideas behind SPL are interesting. However, my main > AG> problem with the whole array and iterator overloading is that it's not > AG> qu