Hans Moog wrote:
> And if you have more than one parameter you will name it
> methodFromStringIntegerSampleClassBoolean ?!?
No, I would rethink my interface.
> And how would you do the same for constructors ?!? Create a
> initWithStringIntegerSampleClassBoolean method which has to be called
> aft
Hans Moog wrote:
You are missing something. Using this new feature would be
voluntarily (it is optional like type hints are already).
Thanks for bringing that up right after I told you that I won't accept
this argument ;-)
If you want to code the old way and you don't want to force coders t
Hans Moog wrote:
> Kcachegrind doesn't show the function signature in the callgraph because the
> parameter signature is not part of the function signature. If the parameter
> siganture would be moved into the function signature, kcachegrind would adept
> and show it.
>
> Btw: You don't have to
