At 07:56 AM 9/8/2005, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
WF>>IMO, "hard kill" doesn't really fit in a system that uses reference
WF>>counts; you either use reference counts, or don't. There are cases
Obviously, we have here conflicting requirements - on the one side,
fclose($a) should invalidate resours
WF>>IMO, "hard kill" doesn't really fit in a system that uses reference
WF>>counts; you either use reference counts, or don't. There are cases
Obviously, we have here conflicting requirements - on the one side,
fclose($a) should invalidate resourse, on the other side, oci_close($a)
should not.
Stanislav Malyshev Wrote
SG>>> $fp1 = fopen('test', 'w');
SG>> $fp2 = $fp1; /* Still a single zval* and le->refcount == 1 */
SG>> $fp3 = &$fp1; /* Two zval*s now and le->refcount == 2 */
SG>>
SG>> fclose($fp1);
I think this was discussed before, though I may be mistaken. The problem
here is that
On 9/8/05, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SG>> SG>> $fp1 = fopen('test', 'w');
> SG>> $fp2 = $fp1; /* Still a single zval* and le->refcount == 1 */
> SG>> $fp3 = &$fp1; /* Two zval*s now and le->refcount == 2 */
> SG>>
> SG>> fclose($fp1);
>
> I think this was discussed before, th
SG>>> $fp1 = fopen('test', 'w');
SG>> $fp2 = $fp1; /* Still a single zval* and le->refcount == 1 */
SG>> $fp3 = &$fp1; /* Two zval*s now and le->refcount == 2 */
SG>>
SG>> fclose($fp1);
I think this was discussed before, though I may be mistaken. The problem
here is that you expect fclose to kill
