Hi!
> I’m requesting that the functions taint() and untaint() as well as
> the ability to log taint information be available in the standard
> interpreter without extensions.
Given that this feature has performance implications, and not
universally needed, I don't think this would be a good idea.
Le 19/11/2015 04:52, Christopher Owen a écrit :
I’m requesting that the functions taint() and untaint() as well as the ability
to log taint information be available in the standard interpreter without
extensions.
Christopher Owen.
On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
I’m requesting that the functions taint() and untaint() as well as the ability
to log taint information be available in the standard interpreter without
extensions.
Christopher Owen.
> On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> As discussion seems to have died out,
Hi!
> As discussion seems to have died out, I would like to propose moving
> to the next stage for inclusion of taint as a first class feature of
> php 7.1.
What is the difference between what exists now (i.e., extension) and
what you seek to do in 7.1? What do you mean by "first class feature"?
On 17/11/15 07:34, Christopher Owen wrote:
> - Including taint as a first class feature will allow for it to be available
> in future linux distribution packages of php
Any decent linux distribution already makes 'optional' extensions easy
to switch on or off. What you are actually proposing by m
