Re: [PHP-DEV] strptime patch

2004-09-28 Thread Sterling Hughes
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:28:39 +0100, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *cough* windows *cough* probably doesn't have strptime (not that you'd care ;-)) > do we still support that platform? who knew? :-P sometimes i often wonder if Zend integrated the Performance Suite into PHP, if we could

Re: [PHP-DEV] strptime patch

2004-09-28 Thread Wez Furlong
*cough* windows *cough* probably doesn't have strptime (not that you'd care ;-)) It's also probably a good idea to add the check for the wierdo unix flavours, just to be safe. --Wez. On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:02:59 -0700, Sterling Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > they are both in Single UNIX, it

Re: [PHP-DEV] strptime patch

2004-09-28 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote: > they are both in Single UNIX, its pretty reliable in my experience > where one is, the other follows. i've only ran into difficulties wrt > to what features are available on different OS', do you know a case > where strptime isn't avail and strftime i

Re: [PHP-DEV] strptime patch

2004-09-28 Thread Sterling Hughes
they are both in Single UNIX, its pretty reliable in my experience where one is, the other follows. i've only ran into difficulties wrt to what features are available on different OS', do you know a case where strptime isn't avail and strftime is? -sterling On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:07:55 +0200 (C

Re: [PHP-DEV] strptime patch

2004-09-27 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Sterling, the proto is slightly wrong. +/* {{{ proto array strptime(string timestamp, string format) + Parse a time/date generated with strftime() into its components */ regards marcus Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 6:15:35 AM, you wrote: > Sterling Hughes wrote: >>hey, >> >>i needed st

Re: [PHP-DEV] strptime patch

2004-09-27 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote: > Sterling Hughes wrote: > > >i needed strptime() for a project i'm working on, its awful handy when > >you are making dates with strftime(). any objections to committing > >the attached patch? I think we need another #ifdef for this for the unlikely s

Re: [PHP-DEV] strptime patch

2004-09-27 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote: > no love for gmail attachments apparently, attached is another effort. It meant that gmail didn't make it a text/plain attachment like it should have done ;-) Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http

Re: [PHP-DEV] strptime patch

2004-09-27 Thread Sterling Hughes
Sterling Hughes wrote: hey, i needed strptime() for a project i'm working on, its awful handy when you are making dates with strftime(). any objections to committing the attached patch? -sterling no love for gmail attachments apparently, attached is another effort. -sterling ? foo.diff Index: b