Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-15 Thread Pierre Joye
hi Lukas! On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > - Scott/Pierre: making the dsn functions available on OSX/FreeBSD/Windows It is done already. > - Pierre: bundling ext/enchant as an ext/pspell replacement I'm ready and waiting for a cvs admin to copy the tree to php-src.

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-13 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Stanislav, Monday, January 12, 2009, 11:19:51 PM, you wrote: > Hi! >> it appears Dmitry and Stas are against that, so I let it for you to >> decide whetehr you want me to drop all of it or continue workig on it >> to make all I can ready for 5.3.0. > I'm not precisely against it because

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-13 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
On 12.01.2009, at 23:04, Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Lukas, it appears Dmitry and Stas are against that, so I let it for you to decide whetehr you want me to drop all of it or continue workig on it to make all I can ready for 5.3.0. Just to clarify my role again. I am not the head decider.

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-13 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 15:03 +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 14:59, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > > > On 12.01.2009, at 14:56, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > > >> Why did the LFS patch never get committed? > > > > LFS = large file support? > > AFAIK there is no patch to commit

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! it appears Dmitry and Stas are against that, so I let it for you to decide whetehr you want me to drop all of it or continue workig on it to make all I can ready for 5.3.0. I'm not precisely against it because I'm not even sure what "it" is. Is there a RFC/proposal somewhere that descri

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Lukas, it appears Dmitry and Stas are against that, so I let it for you to decide whetehr you want me to drop all of it or continue workig on it to make all I can ready for 5.3.0. marcus Monday, January 12, 2009, 10:22:33 PM, you wrote: > Hello Lukas, > Monday, January 12, 2009, 11:56:

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Pierre Joye
hi Marcus! 2009/1/12 Marcus Boerger : >> - @Marcus: where do you see your closures RFC going? > The prototype support needs a bit of tweaking on my local dev machine and > can then be submitted. The direct call stuff should not go into 5.3.0. > Let's do that for 5.3.1 and see to it that we can (e

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Lukas, Monday, January 12, 2009, 11:56:02 AM, you wrote: > Hello all, > Just wanted to get a status update on the work going on: > - Eric and Nathan are working on new php.ini files and I guess they > will soon post their proposals to the list > - @Steph: have you begun work on the Upgra

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
On 12-Jan-09, at 11:36 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: On 12.01.2009, at 16:59, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: On 12-Jan-09, at 5:56 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: - First line of included files not output if they begin with # A patch for this already went in on Friday. was this the one where Nun

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
On 12.01.2009, at 16:59, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: On 12-Jan-09, at 5:56 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: - First line of included files not output if they begin with # A patch for this already went in on Friday. was this the one where Nuno raised some BC concerns? regards, Lukas -- PHP Int

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
On 12-Jan-09, at 5:56 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: - First line of included files not output if they begin with # A patch for this already went in on Friday. Ilia Alshanetsky -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 14:59, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > On 12.01.2009, at 14:56, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > >> Why did the LFS patch never get committed? > > LFS = large file support? > AFAIK there is no patch to commit at this point. http://php.markmail.org/message/rhqy2wu5eu5253fm -Hannes

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
On 12.01.2009, at 14:56, Hannes Magnusson wrote: Why did the LFS patch never get committed? LFS = large file support? AFAIK there is no patch to commit at this point. regards, Lukas -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:56, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > - @Steph: have you begun work on the Upgrading Guide? I would really like to > have something for beta1. The scratchpad should make it possible to get > something going quickly Jakub had a docsprint last week and documented bunch of things

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Guilherme Blanco
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Hello all, > > Just wanted to get a status update on the work going on: > - Ettienne/Lars/Guilherme: whats the status of > spl_object_id()/spl_object_hash()? Lars has an working patch and I'm waiting him to send me to apply and do some t

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > - @Derick: whats the state of the "call_user_func segfault"? Dmitry doesn't want to fix it basically because it could break debuggers. IMO that's a secondary thing, and we should fix things properly without PHP making segfaults. This is however a

Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1

2009-01-12 Thread Scott MacVicar
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Hello all, > > Just wanted to get a status update on the work going on: > - Eric and Nathan are working on new php.ini files and I guess they will > soon post their proposals to the list > - @Steph: have you begun work on the Upgrading Guide? I would really > like to hav