Re: [PHP-DEV] proc_open() resource to opaque object migration

2023-10-17 Thread Máté Kocsis
Hi Tim, > I agree here. While I'm totally in favor of using namespaces in core, it > should be done somewhat consistently. If the proc_* functions are in the > global namespace, then so should the resource object. > While I don't necessarily want to add a dedicated namespace for Process (or what

Re: [PHP-DEV] proc_open() resource to opaque object migration

2023-10-05 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Hi On 9/28/23 23:21, Derick Rethans wrote: Yes, lacking evidence that the name is actually being used: Process PHP "owns" the top level namespace. This has been documented for decades, too. I agree here. While I'm totally in favor of using namespaces in core, it should be done somewhat cons

Re: [PHP-DEV] proc_open() resource to opaque object migration

2023-10-04 Thread G. P. B.
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 21:20, Máté Kocsis wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm writing in connection with a question coming up lately during the > "resource to opaque object migration" project ( > https://github.com/php/php-tasks/issues/6) which we have been working on > for quite a long while. > > Dur

Re: [PHP-DEV] proc_open() resource to opaque object migration

2023-09-28 Thread Derick Rethans
On 28 September 2023 21:19:47 BST, "Máté Kocsis" wrote: >Hi Everyone, > >I'm writing in connection with a question coming up lately during the >"resource to opaque object migration" project ( >https://github.com/php/php-tasks/issues/6) which we have been working on >for quite a long while. > >Duri