Hi!
On 10/19/11 3:23 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
What about https://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call?
I'm not sure what would be the use case for that... But if people need
it, and there's no objections, I don't see any danger in including it.
If we do, we need tests though!
--
Stanislav Ma
Hi,
2011/10/18 Stas Malyshev :
> Hi!
>
> Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least three
> unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon:
> - is_a question
> - serialization changes
> - date fixes
>
> I think the release on 20th should be beta2 and we can
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with
>> the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it
>> already, here and the security list.
>
> please keep in mind that the security is a closed group so
Hi!
On 10/18/11 12:36 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with
the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it
already, here and the security list.
The patch is still not applied. If nobody agrees with me - ok, apply it
then.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Stas Malyshev
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least
> three
> > unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon:
> > - is_a question
>
> wh
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least three
> unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon:
> - is_a question
where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with
the rev
I would also like to have some decision on
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54089 (there already was some
discussion about this @
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg53411.html but
no consensus was reached).
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since w